Explicit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.014 seconds)M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Lal Bahadur and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Babu and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Sharma Prasad and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Chand Verma and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2015
..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
..... to the higher judiciary would be applicable wherever and whenever a situation arose where no explicit provision in the constitution gave primacy to the judicial wing in such cases the validity ..... and most central tenet of american constitutionalism at the outset only a small number of explicit substantive limitations on the exercise of governmental authority were thought essential in the main it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNair Service Society Vs. Government of Kerala and Another
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-08-2015
..... 3 and 6 a of chapter xiva of ker makes it explicitly clear that the said provisions have no application on the preferential appointment of a ..... 35 the government orders which we have already referred to make it explicit that the ban introduced by g o dated 17 11 1999 and modified by ..... no 70 79 g edn dated 2 5 1979 makes it explicitly clear that the said clause was added as the government have decided that in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJiban Krishna Mondal and Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-29-2015
..... service and voluntary organization was made clear the amendment is thus purely clarificatory it made explicit what was implicit before clarificatory amendments will be retrospective in nature since the intention of ..... the 1962 act because of the use of word appointment as members though it was explicit from 1962 rules as noticed above for the reasons aforesaid the state government issued amendment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
..... 1974 have been passed by the parliament since there was no explicit entry natural gas in entry 53 all the aforesaid legislations while ..... referring to mineral oil had indicated explicitly what is otherwise implicit that mineral oil includes natural gas if ..... at the language used 41 income tax act 1961 do not explicitly or impliedly forbid as to how a company and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSt.Mary's Orthodox Church, Vettipuram, Pathanamthitta, Rep. by its Vic ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-07-2015
..... unreasonable consequences therefore it is only to be held that though rule 36 2 may explicitly deal with occupancies like factories etc referred to therein the prescription for open spaces so ..... the kerala panchayats burial and burning grounds rules framed under the kerala panchayats act 1960 explicitly makes a differentiation between the vault type cemetery and other types of burial grounds and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-26-2015
..... 1974 have been passed by the parliament since there was no explicit entry natural gas in entry 53 all the aforesaid legislations while ..... referring to mineral oil had indicated explicitly what is otherwise implicit that mineral oil includes natural gas if ..... at the language used 41 income tax act 1961 do not explicitly or impliedly forbid as to how a company and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial