Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Balkishan Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1980WLN(UC)415

m b sharma j 1 this is an application under section 482 gr p o by the accused appellant praying...

S.K. Verma Vs. Smt. Kamla Kapur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1630; (1980)4SCC569

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

Khushalbhai Mahijibhai Patel Vs. a Firm of MohmadhussaIn Rahimbux

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC977; 1980Supp(1)SCC1; [1980]3SCR22; 1980(12)LC446(SC)

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Richmond Newspapers, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not enumerated notwithstanding the appropriate caution against reading into the constitution rights not explicitly defined the court has acknowledged that certain unarticulated rights are implicit in enumerated ..... unarticulated rights have nonetheless been found to share constitutional protection in common with explicit guarantees footnote 16 the concerns expressed by madison and others have thus been .....

Carlson Vs. Green

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 470 it thus would seem that the most reasonable explanation for congress failure explicitly to provide for damages in bivens actions is that congress intended to leave this responsibility ..... for violations of constitutional rights should be governed by uniform rules absent an explicit statement by congress indicating a contrary intention the importance of federalism in our constitutional system .....

City of Mobile Vs. Bolden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jurisprudence under the equal protection clause if a classification impinges upon a fundamental right explicitly or implicitly protected by the constitution strict judicial scrutiny is required san antonio independent ..... of rights yet when the plurality construes the language of the fifteenth amendment which explicitly acknowledges the right to vote and prohibits its denial or abridgment on account of .....

Maru Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC2147; 1980CriLJ1440; (1981)1SCC107; [1981]1SCR1196

..... dictionary 4th edn p 1571 gives among other things the following meaning for specific definite explicit of an exact or particular nature particular precise while legalese and english are some times ..... a mass of imprisonment cases a specific class of life imprisonment cases and subjects it explicitly to a particularised treatment it follows that section 433a applies in preference to any special .....

Dawson Chem. Co. Vs. Rohm and Haas Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... involved an attempt to control the market for salt tablets used in a patented dispenser explicitly linked the doctrine of patent misuse to the unclean hands doctrine traditionally applied by ..... provision s use in the disjunctive of the term authoriz e suggests that more than explicit licensing agreements is contemplated finally the patentee may enforce his patent rights against contributory .....

Maine Vs. Thiboutot

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the language ambiguous this court s earlier decisions including cases involving social security act claims explicitly or implicitly suggest that the 1983 remedy broadly encompasses violations of federal statutory as ..... rights principal sponsors of the measure in both the house and the senate however explicitly stated during the floor debates that the statute would make fees available more broadly .....

EPA Vs. Nat'l Crushed Stone Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... circumstances justify granting a variance from the 1987 limitations no such explicit variance provision exists with respect to bpt standards but in ..... set of pollution limitations comments in the senate debate were explicit there is no doubt that we will suffer some disruptions ..... 1977 variance provision in the face of 301 c s explicit limitation and in the absence of any other specific direction .....