Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Alexander Vs. Sandoval

Court: US Supreme Court

..... contemplated the availability of private actions brought directly under the statute justice white fairly explicitly rested his conclusion on cannon s holding that an implied right of action exists ..... its own terms the statute supports an action challenging policies of federal grantees that explicitly or unambiguously violate antidiscrimination norms such as policies that on their face limit benefits .....

ins Vs. St. Cyr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reviewing on habeas the question whether the absence of an explicit factual finding that the aliens were undesirable invalidated the warrant ..... u s c 1535 e 2 1994 ed supp v explicitly barring aliens detained under alien terrorist removal procedures from seeking ..... statement requirement was not met not because there was no explicit reference to the eleventh amendment but because the statutory intent .....

Circuit City Stores, Inc. Vs. Adams

Court: US Supreme Court

..... workers engaged in commerce constitute a residual phrase following in the same sentence explicit reference to seamen and railroad employees construing the residual phrase to exclude all employment contracts ..... 12 in justice frankfurter s words naturally enough i find rejection though not explicit of the availability of the federal arbitration act to enforce arbitration clauses in collectivebargaining .....

Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. Vs. West Virginia Dept. of Health ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and courts follow a general practice of not awarding fees to a prevailing party absent explicit statutory authority key tronic corp v united states 511 u s 809 819 congress has ..... rule we follow a general practice of not awarding fees to a prevailing party absent explicit statutory authority key tronic corp v united states 511 u s 809 819 1994 congress .....

Chickasaw Nation Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... withholding petitioners the choctaw and chickasaw nations claim that the gaming act subsection s explicit parenthetical reference exempts them from paying those chapter 35 taxes from which the ..... references arguably concern reporting and withholding the tribes nonetheless claim that the subsection s explicit parenthetical reference to chapter 35 expands the gaming act s scope beyond reporting and .....

Central Bank of India and ors. Vs. Central Bank Canteen Boys Associati ...

Court: Guwahati

..... supreme court held that either statutory obligation or some other obligation explicit or implicit must be cast on the employer to maintain a ..... single judge the supreme court found that although there is no explicit obligation on the part of the lic to provide canteen ..... have to record a finding that there was statutory or other explicit or implicit obligation on the part of the organisation to maintain .....

Krishna S/O Bulaji Borate Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC695; JT2001(1)SC631; 2001(1)SCALE339; [2001]1SCR504; 2001(1)LC490(SC)

..... there is when removed under section 10 though section 6 does not explicitly state that removal is at the pleasure of the government but is ..... in any statute expression of the will of the legislature may be explicit or it may be implicit it is open for the courts ..... statute if so intended to read implicitly in the absence of any explicit words that subserve the intent of the legislature 10 in the present .....

Nevada Vs. Hicks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for enforcement purposes several of our opinions point in that direction in confederated tribes we explicitly reserved the question whether state officials could seize cigarettes held for sale to nonmembers in ..... 2 opinion of the court ante at 376 souter j concurring the court s decision explicitly leave s open the question of tribal court jurisdiction over nonmember defendants in general ante .....

Ferguson Vs. Charleston

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of private dwellings ordinarily afforded the most stringent fourth amendment protection second the court explicitly distinguished the cases dealing with checkpoints from those dealing with special needs sitz 496 ..... traditional warrant and probable cause requirements are waived in our previous cases on the explicit assumption that the evidence obtained in the search is not intended to be used .....

Egelhoff Vs. Egelhoff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law in such circumstances does not directly conflict with any explicit erisa provision for no provision of erisa forbids reading an ..... any event in this case the plan docu 156 ments explicitly foresee that a beneficiary designation may become invalid but they ..... nonetheless an open question namely whether a designation that here explicitly refers to a wife remains valid after divorce the question .....