Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.014 seconds)
Apr 28 2009 (FN)

Fcc Vs. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-28-2009

..... of permissible regulation so that fleeting expletives may not be forbidden to the contrary we explicitly left for another day whether an occasional expletive in a telecast of an elizabethan comedy ..... upon local broadcasting coverage this aspect of the problem is particularly important because the fcc explicitly took account of potential broadcasting impact golden globe order supra at 4980 11 the ease .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2009 (HC)

The Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India Vs. Sub ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-02-2009

Reported in: 2010(1)KarLJ383

..... on the following reasoning 16 the rule making power has been explicitly given for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of ..... justice of india would also be incongruous since the 1997 resolution explicitly states that the information would be given to him in ..... the ethics in government act 1978 as in the united states explicitly obliging judges and other public servants to disclose personal assets .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2009 (HC)

The Cpio, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-02-2009

Reported in: 162(2009)DLT135

..... on the following reasoning 16 the rule making power has been explicitly given for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of ..... justice of india would also be incongruous since the 1997 resolution explicitly states that the information would be given to him in ..... the ethics in government act 1978 as in the united states explicitly obliging judges and other public servants to disclose personal assets .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 2009 (FN)

Negusie Vs. Holder

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-2009

..... congress is certainly capable of declaring its preference for a voluntariness requirement that congress explicit references to voluntariness appear in other sections of this particular statutory scheme rather than ..... should defer to an agency s reasonable formulation of policy in response to an explicit or implicit congressional delegation of authority the chevron framework thus accounts for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 2009 (FN)

Forest Grove School Dist. Vs. T. A.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-22-2009

..... congress intended to supersede our decisions in burlington and carter clause i s safe harbor explicitly bars reimbursement only when a school district makes a fape available by correctly identifying a ..... but how broadly one should read burlington and carter is beside the point congress having explicitly addressed the subject with statutory language that precludes the court s result today b the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2009 (FN)

14 Penn Plaza Llc Vs. Pyett

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-01-2009

..... this court has required only that an agreement to arbitrate statutory antidiscrimination claims be explicitly stated in the collective bargaining agreement wright 525 u s at 80 internal quotation ..... that the cba provision requiring arbitration of their federal antidiscrimination statutory claims is sufficiently explicit in precluding their federal lawsuit brief for plaintiffs appellees in no 06 3047 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 2009 (FN)

Carcieri Vs. Salazar

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-24-2009

..... land into trust for the purpose of providing land for indians congress explicitly referred to current events stating t hat no part of such ..... intended to legislate such a definition it could have done so explicitly as it did in 468 and 472 or it could have ..... u s c 479 for the agency to fill rather it explicitly and comprehensively defined the term by including only three discrete definitions 1 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2009 (FN)

Gross Vs. Fbl Financial Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-18-2009

..... u s unlike title vii which has been amended to explicitly authorize discrimination claims where an improper consideration was a ..... 94 95 2003 congress has since amended title vii by explicitly authorizing discrimination claims in which an improper consideration was ..... to title vii undermine justice stevens argument congress not only explicitly added motivating factor liability to title vii see supra .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Exports Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-06-2009

Reported in: (2009)221CTR(Del)8; [2009]314ITR137(Delhi); [2009]179TAXMAN391(Delhi)

..... amendment introduced by the finance act 2006 this has been made explicit this would be immediately clear by reading the section 140a 1 ..... tax and interest 42 so the amendment merely clarifies and makes explicit what was already implicit even if the amendment had not been ..... brought about by the finance act 2006 which makes the position explicit and beyond doubt it is also noteworthy that the said circular .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 2009 (FN)

Arizona Vs. Gant

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-21-2009

..... of that arrest search the passenger compartment of that automobile ibid footnote omitted despite this explicit statement the opinion of the court in the present case curiously suggests that belton ..... on an interpretation of belton that is plainly incorrect an interpretation that disregards belton s explicit delineation of its holding i would therefore leave any reexamination of our prior precedents .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //