Explicit - Judgment Search Results

R.V. Chem Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1992(59)ELT24(Mad)

the provisions of the foreign exchange regulation act which purport explicity or impliedly to oust such a right if the right

Dharam Pal Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC1852; 1992CriLJ3149; JT1992(2)SC565; 1993Supp(1)SCC517

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

State of Karnataka and Another Vs. K.B. Urushabendra Kumar and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1528

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

Gangotri Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC948; 1992CriLJ1290; 1992(1)Crimes981(SC); JT1992(2)SC417; 1992(1)SCALE610; 1993Supp(1)SCC327; 1992(1)LC755(SC)

..... committed by the candidate or his polling agent or by others with the implicit or explicit consent of the candidate or his polling agent where the supporters of the candidate indulged .....

Premier Tyres Limited Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC1202; 1993(2)KLT130(SC); 1993Supp(2)SCC146

..... committed by the candidate or his polling agent or by others with the implicit or explicit consent of the candidate or his polling agent where the supporters of the candidate indulged .....

Hardev Bhanji Joshi Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC297; 1993CriLJ64; JT1992(4)SC479; 1992(2)SCALE145; 1992Supp(2)SCC561; 1992(2)LC639(SC)

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

State of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC113; 1993CriLJ3903

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Kashinath Sajan Patil Vs. Dr. Deshmukh Hemant Bhaskar and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC187; 1993Supp(2)SCC349

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Jacobson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rights and disparaging the legitimacy and constitutionality of efforts to restrict the availability of sexually explicit materials the government not only excited jacobson s interest in material banned by law ..... pornography changed congress passed the act illegalizing the receipt through the mails of sexually explicit depictions of children in the very month that the new provision became law postal .....

Cipollone Vs. Liggett Group, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... considered the issue of pre emption and has included in the enacted legislation a provision explicitly addressing that issue and when that provision provides a reliable indicium of congressional intent ..... rules exists alongside a doctrine whereby the same result so prophylactically protected from careless explicit provision can be achieved by sheer implication with no express statement of intent at .....