Explicit - Judgment Search Results

A.K. Raju Moopan Vs. Packiam Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)3MLJ713

into only to gather the intention such an intention if explicity expressed in the document itself there is no scope for

K. Radhakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

date of the applicability of the particular office memorandum is explicity it cannot be understood otherwise as giving retrospective effect to

A. Ramanamma Vs. M. Ramakrishnaiah and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(5)ALT529

b s raikote j 1 the original defendant no 5 has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and...

Gadi Koppula Rajamauli Vs. Election Tribunal, (Senior Civil Judge), Ad ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)ALD342; 2000(3)ALT31

ordervaman rao j1 this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india has been filed by the petitioner...

Vanhnuaithanga and ors. Vs. State of Mizoram and ors.

Court: Guwahati

..... issues of law in the first instance and postpones settlement of other issues clearly and explicitly in situations where the court has framed all issues together both of law as well .....

Shamurailatpam Gopal Sharms Vs. Public Prosecutor (Districts), Manipur ...

Court: Guwahati

..... issues of law in the first instance and postpones settlement of other issues clearly and explicitly in situations where the court has framed all issues together both of law as well .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Muddappa

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1999(10)SC221; 1999(II)OLR(SC)343; (1999)5SCC732

..... instrument in evidence objects reasons held when meaning of provision of statute is clear and explicit it is not necessary to advert to objects and reasons of statutes for such conviction .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Jaiswal Coal Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1999(10)SC302; (1999)5SCC733

..... instrument in evidence objects reasons held when meaning of provision of statute is clear and explicit it is not necessary to advert to objects and reasons of statutes

Davis Vs. Sebastian

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC3223; JT1999(6)SC53; 1999(3)KLT225(SC); 1999(5)SCALE66; (1999)6SCC604; [1999]Supp1SCR612; 1999(2)LC1433(SC)

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

K.C. Singh Deo Vs. Niladri Sahu (Dead) by L.Rs. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1856; 88(1999)CLT385(SC); JT1999(4)SC482; 1999(II)OLR(SC)166; 1999(3)SCALE576; (1999)4SCC500; [1999]3SCR538; 1999(2)LC1018(SC)

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....