Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Parents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such classifications the districts have also failed to show they considered methods other than explicit racial classifications to achieve their stated goals narrow tailoring requires serious good faith ..... students who would otherwise attend predominantly white or predominantly black schools elsewhere it used explicitly racial criteria in making these assignments i e it deliberately assigned to the .....

Uttecht Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deference is owed regardless of whether the trial court engages in explicit analysis regarding substantial impairment even the granting of a motion to ..... state supreme court s opinion the state court did make an explicit ruling that juror z was impaired in a portion of ..... of the supreme court of washington s opinion even absent this explicit finding the supreme court of washington s opinion was not .....

Gall Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... listed five considerations as justification for a sentence of probation 1 petitioner s voluntary and explicit withdrawal from the conspiracy 2 his exemplary behavior while on bond 3 the support ..... a weighty factor finally the district court was plainly impressed by petitioner s voluntary and explicit withdrawal from the conspiracy ibid as the government argues the legitimate strength of this .....

Cunningham Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sentencing regimes the constitutionality of which the court has repeatedly reaffirmed california law explicitly authorizes a sentencing court to take into account for example broad sentencing ..... as previously explained the advisory guidelines bounded by reasonableness review effectively albeit less explicitly impose the same requirement on federal judges booker s reasonableness review necessarily .....

R.K. Mobisana Singh Vs. Kh. Temba Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(14)SCALE239; 2009(1)SLJ146(SC); 2008AIRSCW127; 2008(1)SCC747; 2008(4)KCCRSN243

..... no orderas to retrospective senioritygovernment order regularizing the services w e f 26 7 1983 explicitly indicates seniority to be determined later2 i lokendra singh contesting respondent no 1 inslp ..... be determined according torulesgovernment order regularizing the services w e f 9 7 1979 explicitly indicates seniority to be determined later6 th rupachandra singh contesting respondent no 1 in .....

Rita Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... robbery should be punished much more severely than the guidelines base level advises but explicitly noting that the racially biased decisionmaking of the first brother further justified his sentence ..... judge found fact in violation of the sixth amendment appellate courts excessiveness review will explicitly or implicitly accept those judge found facts as justifying sentences that would otherwise be .....

Morse Vs. Frederick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... public school suspended a student for delivering a speech that contained an elaborate graphic and explicit sexual metaphor the court of appeals found that the speech caused no disruption under the ..... in loco parentis to protect children especially in a captive audience from exposure to sexually explicit indecent or lewd speech footnote 7 distancing itself from tinker s approach the fraser court .....

Wilkie Vs. Robbins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... national government is the intended beneficiary of allegedly extortionate acts that act does not speak explicitly to efforts to obtain property for the government rather than a private party so the ..... the second applies when defendants show that congress has provided an alternative remedy which it explicitly declared to be a substitute for recovery directly under the constitution and viewed as equally .....

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. Vs. Metrophones Telecommunica ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... every violation of fcc regulations is an unjust and unreasonable practice here there is an explicit statutory scheme and compensation of payphone operators is necessary to the proper implementation of that ..... intrastate calls 47 cfr 64 1300 2005 in light of the fact that the statute explicitly limits unjust or unreasonable practices to those involving interstate or foreign communication the fcc s .....

James Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... risk of physical injury to another the same is true of completed burglaries which are explicitly covered by the statutory language and provide a baseline against which to measure the degree ..... have gone well beyond the common law understanding in the hobbs act for example congress explicitly expanded the common law definition of extortion to include acts by private individuals scheidler supra .....