Explicit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 186 results (0.014 seconds)Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. and a ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-12-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1818; (1978)4SCC295; [1979]1SCR735; 1978(10)LC755(SC)
order1 an ad interim order of stay passed by the high court of delhi has been challenged before us in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Savanth Vs. the Mysore State Road Transport Corporation and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1133; [1978(36)FLR371]; (1978)ILLJ518SC; (1978)2SCC378; [1978]3SCR398; 1978(10)LC250(SC)
..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJalan Trading Co. (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. D.M. Aney and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-16-1978
Reported in: AIR1979SC233; [1979(38)FLR58]; (1979)ILLJ162SC; (1979)3SCC220
..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhajan Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-31-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1759; 1979CriLJ7; (1978)4SCC77; [1979]1SCR527; 1978(10)LC737(SC)
..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Chandra (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Brij Mohan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-06-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1318; (1978)2SCC361; [1978]2SCR805; 1978(10)LC151(SC)
..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanarsi Dass Chadha and Brothers Vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi Administratio ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-21-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1587; [1978(37)FLR249]; (1978)4SCC11; [1979]1SCR271; 1978(10)LC744(SC)
..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
..... regard to these additional characteristics we declared as much in the first cases explicitly to recognize racial distinctions as suspect distinctions between citizens solely because of their ..... programs designed to avoid exclusion of historically disadvantaged minorities even when such programs explicitly take race into account finds direct support in our cases construing congressional legislation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1978
..... decision of the 1871 debates i would have difficulty inferring from 1983 an explicit congressional declaration against municipal liability for the implementation of official policies in violation ..... unconsidered assumptions of jurisdiction simply cannot outweigh four consistent decisions of this court explicitly considering and rejecting that jurisdiction nor is there any indication that any later .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHutto Vs. Finney
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-1978
..... of constitutional dimension we should not permit items of legislative history to substitute for explicit statutory language the court should be hesitant to presume general congressional awareness sec v ..... case in fitzpatrick we held that under 5 of the fourteenth amendment congress could explicitly allow for recovery against state agencies without violating the eleventh amendment but in fitzpatrick .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirst Nat'l Bank of Boston Vs. Bellotti
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-26-1978
..... u s 367 1968 footnote 24 the court justified its deferential standard of review more explicitly in its discussion of appellants equal protection claim we think that the appropriate standard of ..... corporation footnote 4 5 however where a state permits the organization of a corporation for explicitly political purposes this court has held that its rights of political expression which are necessarily .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial