Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1931 Page 1 of about 39 results (0.011 seconds)
Nov 20 1931 (PC)

A.D. Narayana Sah and ors. Vs. Kannamma Bai (Dead) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-20-1931

Reported in: 140Ind.Cas.422; (1932)62MLJ608

1 this is an appeal from a judgment of eddy j the plaintiff in the court below who has since...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 1931 (PC)

Rustomji and Ginwala Vs. Fazal Rahim

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-1931

Reported in: AIR1932Bom378; (1932)34BOMLR670

case indicate what rigby l j in the later case explicity states that the right to sue upon the order is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 1931 (PC)

Appu L. Rm. Lakshmanan Chetti (Died) and anr. Vs. the Union Board of D ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-04-1931

Reported in: AIR1931Mad520; (1931)60MLJ600

..... place of abode of such member or servant or of such person explicitly stating the cause of action the nature of the relief sought the ..... up the section into four sub clauses and added after the words explicitly stating the cause of action in the first clause the words the ..... amendment in section 156 of act iv of 1884 after the words explicitly stating the cause of action do not find a place in section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 1931 (PC)

G. Gurumurthi Aiyar Vs. Ramaswami Chettiar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-19-1931

Reported in: AIR1931Mad760; (1932)62MLJ199

..... can be recovered by proceeding against the security though that is not explicitly provided for but apart from proceeding against the security the only ..... really intended or not the fact that he has not made an explicit order for attachment in this case but has worded his order ..... what was due on the decree but there again there is no explicit finding in his judgment his view appears to me to be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1931 (FN)

Florida Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-05-1931

..... on the one hand and interstate commerce on the other hand in the absence of explicit findings by the commission justifying such extension of the order p 282 u s 208 ..... it is sufficient on this appeal to observe that there are no findings of proper explicitness to that effect recognizing that the statewide order of the commission as to intrastate rates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1931 (PC)

Lieutenant Srinivasa Rajamani Rajah Deo, the Rajah of Mandasa (Dead) a ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-25-1931

Reported in: 140Ind.Cas.331; (1932)63MLJ450

..... court under other provisions of the act the only section of chapter xi which refers explicitly to the board of revenue is section 172 though it appears that the local government ..... act for determining the rates of rent payable by a ryot that is the only explicit indication in the act on what principles he is to make his settlement there is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1931 (PC)

Jnanadasundari Shaha Vs. Madhabchandra Mala

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-02-1931

Reported in: AIR1932Cal482

..... 12th march 1931 was passed without jurisdiction it may be that the order was not explicit as to the ground on which time was extended or that under the circumstances of ..... to be registered his order might as my learned brother has observed have been more explicit but it does not appear to me that there is any sufficient ground for our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 25 1931 (FN)

Smith Vs. Cahoon

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-25-1931

..... the public against injuries and of the persons or property carried the state commission was explicitly vested with authority to supervise every auto transportation company that was embraced within the ..... statute was demanded and punishment for violation was sought to be inflicted if ignoring the explicit comprehensiveness of their requirements it could be said that the provisions of the statute .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1931 (PC)

Venkatachalam Chetti Vs. Ramaswami Servai (Dead) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-1931

Reported in: AIR1932Mad73; (1932)62MLJ1

..... that purpose 29 in madras the question does not seem to have been dealt with explicitly in any decision under the old code but there is a decision in appaniangar v ..... practice in the courts the legislature would have expressed its intention in clearer and more explicit terms in my opinion rule 12 of order 22 civil procedure code though it is a new .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1931 (PC)

(Yerramilli) Satyanarayanarao and ors. Vs. (Guna) Venkataswamy and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-1931

Reported in: 143Ind.Cas.504

..... para 7 he mentions various considerations bearing upon the question of delivery bat records no explicit finding upon that point he then goes on to consider the applicability of section 47 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //