Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Ohio Vs. Gallagher

Court: US Supreme Court

ohio v gallagher 425 u s 257 1976 u s supreme court ohio v gallagher 425 u s 257 1976...

Tara and Lakha Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1976WLN853

m l shrimal j 1 the two appellants lakha and taga were tried by the learned additional sessions judge jalore...

Niranjan Kumar and ors. Vs. Dhyan Singh and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC2400; (1977)79PLR57; (1976)4SCC89; 1976(8)LC802(SC)

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

Govindbhai Gordhanbhai Patel and ors. Vs. Gulam Abbas Mulla Allibhai a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1019; (1977)3SCC179; [1977]2SCR511

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

Azamjahi Mills Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyd ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1172; [1976]103ITR449(SC); (1976)2SCC258; [1976]3SCR645; 1976(8)LC353(SC)

..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....

Commissioner, Lucknow Division and ors. Vs. Kumari Prem Lata Misra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC334; 1977LabIC169; (1976)4SCC486; [1977]1SCR957; 1976(8)LC916(SC)

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Narayan Vyankatesh Despande

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1204; (1976)3SCC404; [1976]3SCR980; 1976(8)LC442(SC)

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Narhari Shivram Shet Narvekar Vs. Pannalal Umediram

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC164; (1976)3SCC203; [1976]3SCR149

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Tirupagari Tayaramma and ors. Vs. Sri Ramanjaneya Merchantile Co., Elu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1977AP205

..... does not extend limitation period as against third defendant section 20 2 of limitation act explicitly provides that one of several joint contractors as promisors to promissory note cannot be made .....

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the basic first amendment question whether 608 e 1 even as thus narrowly and explicitly construed impermissibly burdens the constitutional right of free expression the court of appeals summarily held ..... restrictions stemming from the separation of powers the position that because congress has been given explicit and plenary authority to regulate a field of activity it must therefore have the power .....