Explicit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 234 results (0.041 seconds)State of Karnataka Vs. Rajan S/O Keshavan and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-16-1993
Reported in: 1994(1)ALT(Cri)464; 1994CriLJ1042; ILR1994KAR318; 1994(1)KarLJ237
hiremath j 1 five accused took trial in the sessions court for offences under sections 449 396 307 i p...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.K. Aneja Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-1993
Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)408; 1994(1)ARBLR92(Delhi); 52(1993)DLT332; 1993(27)DRJ537
..... act 1940 sections 30 amp 33 objection under evidence and reasons not discussed arbitrator without explicitly spelling out awarding the amount for extra items not proper a ward partly set aside .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Annamalai Pillai Vs. District Revenue Officer and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-17-1993
Reported in: I(1993)DMC586SC; JT1993(4)SC113; 1993(2)SCALE75; (1993)2SCC402; [1993]2SCR397
..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaijnath Mahton and Others Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-13-1993
Reported in: AIR1993SC2323; 1993CriLJ2833; 1993(2)Crimes944(SC); JT1993(4)SC95; 1993(3)SCALE53; 1993Supp(3)SCC1
..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMedical Council of India Vs. Silas Nelson and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-14-1993
Reported in: AIR1994SC777; JT1993(3)SC455; 1993(2)SCALE961; (1993)3SCC184; [1993]3SCR787; (1993)2UPLBEC1207
..... committed by the candidate or his polling agent or by others with the implicit or explicit consent of the candidate or his polling agent where the supporters of the candidate indulged .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhem Chand Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-1993
Reported in: AIR1994SC226; 1994CriLJ253; JT1993(5)SC310; 1993(3)SCALE738; 1994Supp(1)SCC7
..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshok Kumar Vs. Registrar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-19-1993
Reported in: ILR1993KAR3472; 1993(3)KarLJ390
..... cannot be construed to mean that said date is outer limit for payment since agreement explicitly stipulates that amount should be paid within 6 months from date of agreement reckonable date .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlbright Vs. Oliver
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-12-1993
..... authority by the government in particular situations where a particular amendment provides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection against a particular sort of government behavior ..... under the fourth amendment s reasonableness standard because the fourth amendment provides an explicit textual source of constitutional protection against this sort of physically intrusive governmental .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReno Vs. Catholic Social Services, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1993
..... lujan v national wildlife federation 497 u s 871 1990 the court there stated absent explicit statutory authorization for immediate judicial review a regulation is not ordinarily considered the type ..... challenge to a benefit conferring rule will of necessity be constitutionally unripe for otherwise an explicit statutory review provision would not help cure the ripeness problem rather lujan points to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBray Vs. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1993
..... including the need to preserve our essential liberties and traditions indeed the statute itself explicitly directs the attorney general to consider the need to avoid unnecessary federal involvement and ..... every legislative classification based on pregnancy was equivalent for equal protection purposes to the explicitly gender based distinctions struck down in frontiero v richardson 411 u s 677 1973 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial