Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Khubchand Baghel Son of Judawan Singh Vs. Vidyacharan Shukla Son of Ra ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1963MP306; 1963MPLJ570

krishnan j 1 this is an appeal under section 116a of the representation of the people act 1951 by the...

Smt. Kamala Devi Vs. Seth Takhatmal and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1964SC859; 1963MhLJ730(SC); [1964]2SCR152

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Arizona Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... these matters to state law and developed principles of equitable apportionment subject only to the explicit exceptions provided in the act for these reasons i respectfully dissent from the construction ..... with that in 5 c relating to the distribution of electrical power the latter provision explicitly gives the secretary authority to resolve conflicts in applications referring him for the governing .....

United States Vs. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 341 the legislative history is silent on the specific questions why the amendment made no explicit reference to mergers why assets acquisitions by corporations not subject to ftc jurisdiction were not ..... to remove all question concerning the ftc s remedial power over corporate acquisitions and therefore explicitly enlarged the ftc s jurisdiction congress choice of this means of underscoring the ftc s .....

School Dist. of Abington Tp. Vs. Schempp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... instruction in the projected elementary and secondary schools contrasts significantly with jefferson s quite explicit proposals concerning religious instruction at the university of virginia his draft for a ..... wholly inadequate to support an informed or responsible decision both cases involve provisions which explicitly permit any student who wishes to be excused from participation in the exercises .....

Bhikhan Bobla and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1963P& H255

..... constitution it was amended by act 39 of 1950 which only made explicit what had been left to be gathered from the whole tenor of ..... by the general rule it would be necessary for it to use explicit terms in order to absolve the board from the necessity of giving ..... of the lawgiver where the language of an act is clear and explicit we must give effect to it whatever may be the consequences for .....

Fay Vs. Noia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... into our own law in the colonial period footnote 6 given explicit recognition in the federal constitution art i 9 cl 2 footnote ..... only the right to be heard but also a number of explicit procedural rights for example the right not to be convicted upon ..... deliberate choice the states are also warned that even a deliberate explicit intelligent choice not to assert a constitutional right may not preclude .....

P.R. Kanakasabapathi Chettiar and ors. Vs. P.V. Govindarajulu Naidu an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1964)1MLJ135

..... exhibit b 2 dated 13th march 1956 it has to be made explicit and clear that this release was operative in respect of the ..... properties or whether others participated in those rights as well the agreement explicitly being in favour of the two plaintiffs also if they chose to ..... release deed exhibit b 2 as we stressed earlier exhibit b 2 explicitly relates to the rights of mr sri hari naidu alone and .....

P.R. Kanakasabapathi Chettiar and ors. Vs. P.V. Govindarajulu Naidu an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1964Mad219

..... by the appellants for in ex b 2 mr sri hari naidu explicitly states that in view of the consideration of rs 13000 paid to ..... the properties or whether others participated in those rights as well the agreement explicitly being in favour of the two plaintiffs also it they chose to ..... release deed ex b 2 as we stressed earlier ex b 2 explicitly relates to the rights of mr sri hari naidu alone and leaves .....

Sec Vs. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the selling to another at a substantially higher price on the same day the opinion explicitly distinguishes between what is necessary to prove common law fraud and the grounds under securities ..... prices above the market in all of these cases but arleen hughes which turned on explicit provisions against nondisclosure the concealment involved clearly reflected dishonest dealing that was vital to the .....