Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 65 results (0.01 seconds)
May 26 1952 (SC)

The State of Bombay Vs. Purushottam Jog Naik

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-26-1952

Reported in: AIR1952SC317; 1952CriLJ1269; (1952)IIMLJ338(SC); [1952]1SCR674

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1952 (FN)

Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. Vs. Sawyer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-02-1952

..... authority asserted by the seizure or if the seizure had been only for a short explicitly temporary period to be terminated automatically unless congressional approval were given these and other ..... remedy for potential dangers was unequivocally put aside the senate labor committee through its chairman explicitly reported to the senate that a general grant of seizure powers had been considered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 28 1952 (FN)

Beauharnais Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-28-1952

..... the constitutional guarantee of free speech to every person is explicitly qualified by holding him responsible for the abuse of that ..... reasoning was echoed so recently as 1937 when the court explicitly rejected the theory of incorporation and through mr justice cardozo ..... press reserve a responsibility for their abuse and implicitly or explicitly recognize validity of criminal libel laws footnote 5 6 we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 10 1952 (FN)

United States Vs. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-10-1952

..... some rights personal to a party may be waived either explicitly or by failure to assert them but i find no explicit waiver here nor is it clear to me how the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 1952 (FN)

Carlson Vs. Landon

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-10-1952

..... act defendant we would hesitate to impute to congress in the absence of some more explicit command an intent to make bail more readily available to those held on a serious ..... act was with the problem of the communist party that act for the first time explicitly made membership in the communist party a ground for deportation footnote 3 8 it puts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1952 (HC)

Hiraman Ratan and ors. Vs. Purshottam Deorao

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-10-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Bom260; (1953)55BOMLR170; ILR1953Bom680

..... all the provisos we are more particularly concerned here with proviso a is clear and explicit and leaves no doubt in our minds that what the legislature has intended by enacting ..... 391 in our opinion the language used in the second proviso is fairly clear and explicit and makes this proviso retrospective in its effect what the legislature says is that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1952 (HC)

Dwarka Das Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-30-1952

Reported in: AIR1953P& H120

..... secy of state 51 bom 725 p c it was held that the section is explicit and mandatory and admits of no implications at p 303 of mulla s civil procedure code the ..... p c appears to be decisive it was there said that section 80 is express explicit and mandatory and admits of no implications or exceptions the question there was whether a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 1952 (FN)

United States Vs. Universal C.i.T. Credit Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-22-1952

..... liability it could easily have said so just as it had no difficulty in stating explicitly that the unit for civil liability was what was owing to each employee instead of ..... 5 each provision page 344 u s 223 set the maximum fine at 500 and explicitly defined what constituted a separate offense as to 6 and 7 the employee was the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1952 (HC)

Calcutta Motor Cycle Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-18-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Cal1

..... liability of the state is in my view also plain under the indian railways act explicit recognition of the responsibility of a railway administration for loss destruction or deterioration appears from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 1952 (HC)

Bhaironlal Vs. Rampershad

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-05-1952

Reported in: AIR1954Raj49

..... door closed and stop the defendant s passage through his yard whenever he liked it explicitly says that defendant 1 would have no other right in the chauk the presumption therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //