Explicit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 136 results (0.011 seconds)Madan Lal Kharbanda Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-1968
Reported in: 5(1969)DLT578
the reversion order which should be quashed the petitioner has explicity pleaded in para 11 of the present petition that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManager, Pyarchand Kesarimal Ponwal Bidi Factory Vs. Omkar Laxman Than ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC823; (1971)73BOMLR92; [1970(20)FLR140]; 1970LabIC737; (1970)ILLJ492SC; [1969]2SCR272
..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kokkiliagada Meerayya and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-28-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC771; (1969)1SCC161
..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVirjiram Sutaria Vs. Nathalal Premji Bhavadia and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-04-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC765; (1969)1SCC77; [1969]2SCR627
..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
..... prohibit advertising or other representations that indicate discriminatory preferences footnote 8 it does not refer explicitly to discrimination in financing arrangements footnote 9 or in the provision of brokerage services ..... but in all property transactions would not have received a great deal of criticism explicitly directed to this feature the fact that the 1866 act received no criticism of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Southwestern Cable Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1968
..... of catv for its regulatory responsibilities first order and report supra the proceeding was explicitly restricted to those systems that are served by microwave but the commission s conclusions ..... commission in 1959 and again in 1966 footnote 30 sought legislation that would have explicitly authorized such regulation and that its efforts were unsuccessful in the circumstances here however .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWilliams Vs. Rhodes
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-15-1968
..... handed requirements of longstanding state laws we are told today however that despite the power explicitly granted to the state legislatures under art ii 1 the legislature of ohio nonetheless ..... choosing whatever process it may wish for the appointment of electors three separate constitutional amendments explicitly limit a legislature s power the fifteenth amendment makes clear that if voters are to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFpc Vs. Sunray Dx Oil Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-06-1968
..... was setting almost entirely as initial prices and gave no explicit consideration to their effects as refund floors footnote 12 a ..... the commission was not obliged in this instance to give explicit consideration to the establishment of a distinct refund floor the ..... stating that because there was in the temporary certificates no explicit language to warn the producers of the possibility of a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOestereich Vs. Selective Svc. Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-16-1968
..... those decisions that had deviated from the rule against pre induction review and made explicit its absolute commitment against premature judicial interference with the orderly processing of registrants the ..... service system footnote 3 7 although the language of 10 b 3 contains no explicit reference to habeas corpus as a remedy for inductees seeking to challenge their classifications that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHardIn Vs. Kentucky Utilities Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-16-1968
..... the act makes the existence of a private supplier an explicit bar to tva expansion only within the additional region we ..... 1955 is thus misplaced the court in mckay ruled that an explicit statutory provision was necessary to confer standing because of the ..... two staff memoranda upon which the authority s belated determination was explicitly based included among the facts which appear to be relevant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial