Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Nlrb Vs. Hearst Publications, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is whether the newsboys are employees because congress did not explicitly define the term respondents say its meaning must be determined ..... eliminating the causes of that unrest it is premised on explicit findings that strikes and industrial strife themselves result in large ..... to the employees of a particular employer unless the act explicitly states otherwise the suggestion seems to be that congress .....

Cornell Steamboat Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... commerce act relating respectively to regulation of rail carriers motor carriers and freight forwarders explicitly or by judicial interpretation cover all shipments which pass through the territory of two ..... 234 u s 342 the control over state rates discriminatory against interstate rates is explicitly denied 303 k and numerous other exceptions and exemptions show congressional intent to confer .....

Mercoid Corp. Vs. Mid-continent Investment Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which it seeks with this in mind i wish to make explicit my protest against talking about the judicial doctrine of contributory ..... not once has this court found it relevant to reject either explicitly or by indirection another doctrine of the law that of ..... experience of centuries is behind the wisdom of not deciding whether explicitly or by atmospheric pressure matters that do not come to the .....

United States Vs. Blair

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a grossly unequal obligation we cannot sanction such liability without more explicit language in the contract compare crook co v united states ..... u s 138 unless the terms of a contract are so explicit as to preclude it the presupposition of fair dealing surely ..... have been wholly futile and worse than futile to invoke the explicit provisions of the contract for resort to administrative relief therefore .....

Bowles Vs. Willingham

Court: US Supreme Court

..... other grounds was directly in the teeth of the statute s explicit provisions and a violation of its terms by this mandate ..... the following limitations or reservations which i think should be stated explicitly 1 the order or regulation must not be invalid on its ..... fact are but the enforcement of an enactment by congress whether explicitly avowed or not the present decision overrules that in the schechter .....

Mclean Trucking Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... especially to the issues concerning antitrust policy and railroad affiliation section 5 lays down more explicit commands one is a specific exemption of carriers and individuals participating in an approved ..... history of the development of the special national transportation policy suggests quite apart from the explicit provision of section 5 11 that the policies of the antitrust laws determine the .....

Trainmen Vs. Toledo, P. and W. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... effort by only one conciliatory device when others are available the explicit terms demand every reasonable effort to settle the dispute three ..... footnote 13 and its very terms show they were used in explicit contemplation of the procedures and machinery then existing under the ..... purpose runs throughout the act s provisions it is dominant and explicit in section 8 in short the intent evidenced both by .....

Brown Vs. Gerdes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to a state court the finding as to allowances required by 221 4 is as explicit and as mandatory as the finding of fair and equitable and feasible required by 221 ..... state courts not only by the general implications of our legal system but also by explicit authorization the nature of the obligation of the state court under such legislation has been .....

Hira Lal Murarka and ors. Vs. Mangtulal Bagaria and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1947Cal221

..... the suit could not be maintained 28 section 80 says lord sumner is ex press explicit and mandatory and it admits of no implication or exceptions and again to argue that ..... delivered by viscount sumner it is observed at p 357 that section 80 is express explicit and mandatory and it admits of no implications or exceptions and at p 358 that .....

Pitchika Somanna and ors. Vs. Putchala Chinnayya

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1945Mad107

..... section 10 religious endowments act 1863 oldfield j pointed out that the act contained no explicit provision for review and in dealing with section 141 civil p c he made the ..... a matter of procedure but the recognition of substantive right which must be conferred in explicit terms and similarly it confers no right to a review 2 seshagiri ayyar j s .....