Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 120 results (0.02 seconds)
Dec 05 1967 (HC)

B.H. Shyamu Vs. Bhoopalam K. Rajashekhar and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-05-1967

Reported in: 1968CriLJ1243

orderk bhimiah j 1 the petitioner in criminal revision petition no 276 67 is the complainant and petitioners in criminal...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1967 (HC)

M. Vs. Chacko V. State of Madras.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-26-1967

Reported in: [1968]70ITR801(Mad)

particular contingency we have already noticed further the agreement also explicity shows the intention of the parties to treat the advances

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 29 1967 (SC)

Collector of Varanasi Vs. Gauri Shankar Misra and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-29-1967

Reported in: AIR1968SC384; 1968(16)BLJR114; [1968]1SCR372

..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 1967 (SC)

Kamla Prasad Singh Vs. Hari Nath Singh and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-27-1967

Reported in: AIR1968SC19; 1968CriLJ86; [1967]3SCR828

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1967 (SC)

Khambalia Municipality and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-16-1967

Reported in: AIR1967SC1048; [1967]2SCR631

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 1967 (SC)

State of Bombay (Now Gujarat) Vs. Memon Mahomed Haji Hasam

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-05-1967

Reported in: [1967]3SCR938; AIR1967SC1885

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 1967 (FN)

Prima Paint Corp. Vs. Flood and ConklIn Mfg. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-12-1967

..... in issue that language considered alone far from providing an explicit answer merely poses the further question of what kind of ..... bar association which drafted and supported the act was even more explicit i think this will operate something like an injunction process ..... footnote 2 29 the drafters of the act were very explicit a federal statute providing for the enforcement of arbitration agreements .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1967 (FN)

Baltimore and Ohio R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-27-1967

..... depth to determine its effects upon the national transportation system thus the icc is explicitly directed to consider 1 the effect of the proposed transaction upon adequate transportation service ..... any given route if that happens the possibilities of oligopolistic lessening of competition without explicit rate and market agreements is likely see chamberlin theory of monopolistic competition 46 53 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1967 (HC)

The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Referring O ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1967

Reported in: (1969)1MLJ1

..... last few observations alone divorced from the earlier dicta and the explicit fact that the learned judges were dealing with a document which ..... of a mortgage deed as defined in law the learned judge explicitly observed leaving aside the question of registration of an insufficiently stamped ..... stamp act we think it is sufficient to observe that very explicit words are to be found in the tamil text to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 1967 (FN)

Denver and Rio Grande Western R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-05-1967

..... the notes be made the subject of competitive bidding the icc explicitly rejected the argument that 10 of the clayton act 15 u ..... the act in contrast to 20a which by its detailed and explicit terms deals only with the problem of fiscal responsibility footnote 2 ..... fall within the purview of 5 section 5 not only deals explicitly with problems of control but it establishes the public interest criteria .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //