Explicit - Judgment Search Results

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... d s restriction to have this dramatic and constitutionally questionable effect it would say so explicitly because there is nothing that compels us to conclude that congress intended donations to ..... and in mcfl the court arguably eliminated any ambiguity remaining in buckley when it explicitly stated that the narrowing interpretations taken in buckley were necessary in order to avoid problems .....

United States Vs. American Library Assn., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to minors and in preventing patrons from being unwillingly exposed to patently offensive sexually explicit content to prevent patrons from accessing visual depictions that are obscene and child pornography ..... less restrictive alternatives for libraries to prevent patrons from being unwillingly exposed to sexually explicit content on the internet 201 f supp 2d at 410 those findings are consistent .....

United States Vs. White MountaIn Apache Tribe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... tucker act claim would leave mitchell ii wrongly decided for there is no federal statute explicitly providing that inadequate timber management would be compensated through a suit for damages more fundamentally ..... mitchell ii a wrongly decided case for one would look in vain for a statute explicitly providing that inadequate timber management would be compensated through a suit for damages but the .....

Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2003)LC56Tri(Kol.)kata

..... inasmuch as it cannot be said that implicit has been made explicit subsequently on the simple reasoning that there was nothing implicit ..... was implicit in the mother notification no 157 76 was made explicit by amending the same subsequently she therefore observed that the ..... as it could not be said that implicit has been made explicit subsequently on the simple reasoning that there was nothing implicit .....

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Devans Modern Brewaries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2003(10)SC485; 2003(10)SCALE202; (2004)11SCC26

..... constitutions one can conclude that the indian provisions for free trade and commerce are more explicit while the australian constitution failed to expressly define restrictions the american constitution defined the ..... they refuse to acknowledge man s power to make his own history and they explicitly reject the notion that observed institutions of interaction are in themselves products of intended .....

State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. Vs. Campbell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state farm s operations throughout the country the utah supreme court s opinion makes explicit that state farm was being condemned for its nationwide policies rather than for the ..... underpayments for example several documents evaluating the performance of managers noxon and brown contained explicit preset average payout goals ibid regarding liability for verdicts in excess of policy limits .....

Metallurgical Engineering Consultants (i) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of B ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2004(1)JCR542(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ793Jhar

..... indicate that the obligation to provide the facility of canteen or other establishment may be explicit or implicit and whether the provision for canteen service or other service has become part ..... mecon and the canteen employees of course if there was an obligation statutory or otherwise explicit or implicit it may be open to the court to pierce the veil to come .....

Scheidler Vs. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the fact that the antiracketeering act the predecessor to the hobbs act contained sections explicitly prohibiting both the hobbs act omission is particularly significant because a paramount congressional concern ..... commit extortion or coercion within the definition of 407 act contained both a section explicitly prohibiting coercion and a section prohibiting the offense of extortion as defined by the .....

Coal Mines Officers' Association of India and Ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)187CTR(Cal)348,[2004]266ITR429(Cal)

..... actually paid should not be treated as perquisite that made it explicit that in relation to every case there may not be a fixation ..... rent while however doing so it made the value of concession explicit which was implied in the previous rule while devising the same it has ..... how the value of x would be determined has been made explicit one standard has been prescribed there is now no scope of determing .....

Stogner Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as an exercise of congress war powers id at 507 without explicit consideration of any potential collision with the ex post facto ..... the act of banishment the only item in this complicated history explicitly cited by chase explained that clarendon was being banished because ..... category rather than his second one in fact the impeachment explicitly alleged that clarendon violated the law see id at 330 .....