Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Shanmugathammal and ors. Etc. Vs. Valliappan Alias Vallinayagam and or ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1971)2MLJ149

g ramanujam j 1 civil revision petitions nos 1768 of 1966 and 615 of 1967 have been filed by respondents...

State of Assam and anr. Vs. Daksha Prasad Deka and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC173; 1971LabIC27; (1971)ILLJ554SC; (1970)3SCC624; [1971]2SCR687

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

Joharmal Murlidhar and Co. Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Assam ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC1980; [1971]79ITR6(SC); (1970)3SCC331

..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Krishna Cinema and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1650; (1971)73BOMLR896; (1970)2SCC744; [1971]2SCR110

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

R.C. Chandiok and anr. Vs. Chuni Lal Sabharwal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1238; (1970)3SCC140; [1971]2SCR573; 1971(III)LC35(SC)

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Mannan Lal Vs. Chhotaka Bibi, (Dead) by Lrs. B. Sharda Shankar and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1374; (1970)1SCC769; [1971]1SCR253

..... at the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 of section 31 will make it explicitly clear that any application in any reference meaning thereby even an application under section 20 .....

Oregon Vs. Mitchell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to them that the states longstanding plenary control over voter qualifications would be affected without explicit language to that effect and since no speaker during the debates on the fourteenth ..... two features emerge from such a review with startling clarity first the committee regularly rejected explicitly page 400 u s 171 enfranchising proposals in favor of plans which would postpone .....

Williams Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... expectation that a substantive change would be effected by the inclusion or deletion of an explicit vicinage requirement the latter explanation is if anything the more plausible finally contemporary legislative ..... in the administration of their own criminal law or else intolerably to relax the explicit restrictions that the framers actually did put upon the federal government in the administration .....

Toussie Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... interpretation and the presidential proclamation itself since 1941 selective service regulations issued under authority explicitly granted the president 50 u s c app 460 1964 ed and supp iv ..... type of offense is involved for purposes of the statute of limitations given the explicit provisions of 453 the continuing duty regulation and the consistent administrative interpretation of the .....

Adickes Vs. S. H. Kress and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... under the compulsion of state law offends the fourteenth amendment although this court has not explicitly decided the fourteenth amendment state action issue implicit in this question underlying the court ..... coaches and steamboats none of the provisions of the amended statutes though apparently never explicitly repealed appear in the 1880 mississippi code or in subsequent codifications of state law .....