Explicit - Judgment Search Results

New Mexico Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... possession of the texas claimants id page 275 u s 281 10 new mexico having explicitly declared in her constitution of 1912 that her boundary between parallels of 32 and 314 ..... the state of texas footnote 24 new mexico when admitted as a state in 1912 explicitly declared in its constitution that its boundary ran along said thirty second parallel to the .....

Sukhdevdoss Ramprasad Vs. Mt. Choti Bai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad118

..... c 216 shows that a prohibition of adoption according to the bombay law must be explicit in that case their lordships dealing with parties governed by bombay law expressed the opinion ..... husband authorized or directed his wife to adopt a certain boy it would require an explicit prohibition to prevent her from adopting any other boy should the boy named by the .....

Sukdevdoss Ramprasad Vs. Musammat Choti Rai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 109Ind.Cas.5

..... a 513 shows that a prohibition of adoption according to the bombay law must be explicit in that case their lordships dealing with parties governed by bombay law expressed the opinion ..... husband authorized or directed his wife to adopt a certain boy it would require an explicit prohibition to prevent her from adopting any other boy should the boy named by the .....

Whitney Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or assembled to advocate teach or aid and abet criminal syndicalism is sufficiently clear and explicit to satisfy the requirement of due process of law p 274 u s 368 6 ..... act plainly meets the essential requirement of due process that a penal statute be sufficiently explicit to inform those who are subject to it what conduct on their part will render .....

Cuddappah Ghouse Khan Vs. Balasubba Rowther

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 105Ind.Cas.109

..... question at some length and held that the words of the section are clear and explicit and leave no room for any other construction the first of these english cases is .....

Gurijala Pedda Venkatayya Vs. Komerla Kistappa

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad340

..... damages though clause 11 of section 3 of the act defining rent is not very explicit on the point it seems to me that having regard to the language employed and .....

Kuppuswami Goundan Vs. Chinnaswami Goundan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad546

..... the answer clearly realized difficulties that there were in their way having regard to the explicit terms of section 50 registration act as it was understood the learned judges arrived at .....

(Kunnath Veetil) Ittunan Panikkar Vs. (Natuvila Madhathil) Narayana Bh ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad607

..... no doubt the language of rule 10 with regard to that matter is not as explicit as might be desired but it seems to us that the expression by leave of .....

K. Venkataraya Prabhu Vs. Vasudeva Prabhu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad897; 108Ind.Cas.294

..... deed and trust deed executed by me in his favour i have made it more explicit by this document 3 on the death of ramakrishna prabhu the appellant applied to execute .....

T.R. Sundaraswamiar and ors. Vs. K.R. Narayanaswamiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1928Mad1107

..... order under rule 92 civil p c has been taken away inasmuch as it is explicitly stated that the order relating to appealable orders order 43 would not apply to any .....