Explicit - Judgment Search Results

B. Archana Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Secretary, La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(6)ALD582; 2005(6)ALT364

..... organized constitutional system of a secular democracy is imperiled by the impugned religion explicit scheme of reservations in educational institutions and public employment chorus the petitioners the ..... action to achieve a realistic and functional measure of equality constitutional instruments enact explicit power to governments in this area the indian constitution is illustrative of such .....

Brown Vs. Payton

Court: US Supreme Court

..... admonished the jury that the prosecutor s comments were merely argument but it did not explicitly instruct that the prosecutor s interpretation was incorrect finding the special circumstance of murder in ..... prosecutor never claimed that the testimony was not relevant id at 385 rather the prosecutor explicitly assumed that petitioner s character evidence was a proper factor in the weighing process but .....

State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3820; 2005CriLJ3950; 122(2005)DLT194(SC); (2005)11SCC600

..... police officer admissible in the trial does not say anything explicitly about the use of confession made by co accused the words ..... discovered that can be proved and nothing more it is explicitly clarified in the section that there is no taboo against receiving ..... a statutory authority what is necessarily implicit is perhaps made explicit but the notable safeguards which were lacking in tada are to .....

United States Vs. Booker

Court: US Supreme Court

..... because as we have previously held a statute that does not explicitly set forth a standard of review may nonetheless do so ..... l rev 185 187 1993 hereinafter hatch emphasis added consequently congress explicitly rejected as a model for reform the various proposals for advisory ..... at 201 the court claims that a statute that does not explicitly set forth a standard of review may nonetheless do so implicitly .....

Exxon Mobil Corp. Vs. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... least with respect to rule 20 plaintiffs is strengthened by the fact that 1367 b explicitly excludes supplemental jurisdiction over claims against defendants joined under rule 20 we cannot accept ..... reading of the statute s text and nothing in the legislative history indicates directly and explicitly that congress understood the phrase civil action of which the district courts have original .....

Johnson Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... were unwilling to assume that state or local prison authorities might mistakenly regard such an explicit pronouncement as evincing any dilution of this court s firm commitment to the fourteenth amendment ..... prisons and jails ibid emphasis added those justices were unwilling to assume that such an explicit pronouncement would evinc e any dilution of this court s firm commitment to the fourteenth .....

Granholm Vs. Heald

Court: US Supreme Court

..... out of state wineries to make direct sales to consumers this differential treatment explicitly discriminates against interstate commerce by limiting the emerging and significant direct sale ..... consumers the differential treatment between in state and out of state wineries constitutes explicit discrimination against interstate commerce this discrimination substantially limits the direct sale of wine .....

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

..... 58 1 a and 58 1 b of dcr 2001 consciously explicitly and deliberately delete crucial phrases as they stood in dcr 58 ..... in any manner dcr 62 3 has been specially enacted to explicitly empower the state government to respond to such queries and to ..... 7th july 2004 from the ministry of environment and forests it is explicitly clear from the report of maharashtra pollution control board dated 30th .....

R. Lakshminarayanan Vs. Inspector of Police Cbi

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2005CriLJ4621; ILR2005KAR5479; 2006(6)KarLJ443

..... if that was the correct position at least section 162 criminal procedure code would have said so explicitly section 165 of the evidence act was already there when section 162 criminal procedure code was enacted ..... argument of the appellant that the language of section 162 criminal procedure code though wide is not explicit or specific enough to extend the prohibition to the use of the wide and special .....

National Cable and Telecommunications Assn. Vs. Brand X Internet Servi ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... an agency action qualifies for chevron deference when congress has explicitly or implicitly delegated to the agency the authority to fill ..... commission ruled on value added networks the statute did not explicitly provide for forbearance any more than it provided for the ..... chaotic undermining of all prior judicial decisions that do not explicitly renounce ambiguity is the court s explanation of why agency .....