Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 232 results (0.012 seconds)
Jun 29 2006 (FN)

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-2006

..... which a jurisdiction stripping provision was denied immediate effect in pending cases absent an explicit statutory reservation by contrast the cases granting such immediate effect are legion and they ..... discussion of legislative history the court wholly ignores the president s signing statement which explicitly set forth his understanding that the dta ousted jurisdiction over pending cases footnote 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 2006 (FN)

Gonzales Vs. Oregon

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-17-2006

..... interpret these phrases upon the attorney general first the attorney general is solely and explicitly charged with administering the registration and deregistration provisions see 823 f 824 a by making ..... the attorney general authority to interpret those criteria whether or not there is any explicit delegation provision in the statute sometimes the legislative delegation to an agency on a particular .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 2006 (FN)

Woodford Vs. Ngo

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-22-2006

..... law context we have also imposed waiver requirements even in the absence of explicit statutory directive this judge made rule discussed extensively by the majority see ante ..... some procedurally defective manner indeed california like the vast majority of state prison systems explicitly gives prison administrators an opportunity to hear untimely or otherwise procedurally defective grievances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 2006 (FN)

Arlington Central School Dist. Bd. of Ed. Vs. Murphy

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-26-2006

..... not be read to permit recovery of expert fees without explicit statutory authority but concluded that a congressional conference committee report ..... to permit a prevailing party to recover expert fees without explicit statutory authority indicating that congress intended for that sort of ..... through rule 54 d or any other provision not referring explicitly to witness fees id at 445 the reasoning of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 19 2006 (FN)

Rapanos Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-2006

..... post at 25 23 this standard certainly does not come from riverside bayview which explicitly rejected such case by case determinations of ecological significance for the jurisdictional question whether ..... read to include some wetlands namely those that directly abut covered waters riverside bayview explicitly acknowledged that 1344 g 1 does not conclusively determine the construction to be placed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2006 (FN)

League of United LatIn American Citizens Vs. Perry

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2006

..... test for identifying unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering must do what appellants sole motivation theory explicitly disavows show a burden as measured by a reliable standard on the complainants ..... earlier in conformance with a decennial census the constitution and congress state no explicit prohibition although the legislative branch plays the primary role in congressional redistricting our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 22 2006 (FN)

Fernandez-vargas Vs. Gonzales

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-22-2006

..... 110 stat 3009 625 unlike its predecessor 241 a 5 applies to all illegal reentrants explicitly insulates the removal orders from review and generally forecloses discretionary relief from the terms of ..... expanding the class of people to whom criminal penalties for illegal reentry might apply however explicitly apply only to postenactment reentries see iirira 324 c 110 stat 3009 629 note following .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 11 2006 (FN)

Brown Vs. Sanders

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-11-2006

..... dissenting to the facts underlying the eligibility circumstances but we explicitly held that any such effect cannot fairly be regarded as ..... is significant in a weighing state for the judge will explicitly tell the jury to consider that particular aggravating factor in ..... is one of emphasis not of evidence indeed the court explicitly disavowed the suggestion that mississippi s reliance on the especially .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2006 (HC)

Dr. Prashanta Padmanabha AmIn Vs. R.N. Sheetal Wad

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2006

Reported in: 130(2006)DLT410

..... been submitted earlier 26 the directions of the apex court were explicit requiring the medical council of india to either accept or reject ..... made by the apex court on 8th march 2002 are clear explicit unconditional and unequivocal 63 there can be no dispute with ..... the petitioner on the part of the respondent was clear and explicit 70 inasmuch as the petitioner has vehemently contended that this action .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 2006 (HC)

In Re: Modern Syntex (India) Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-01-2006

Reported in: [2009]148CompCas843(Raj); [2007]76SCL157(Raj)

..... to order the said sale at pre winding up stage under any explicit provision of the companies act the order of sale can be ..... court was found to be unfounded as bifr was found to be explicitly vested with this power by virtue of section 20 4 of ..... which was vested under sica was an overriding power the parliament having explicitly conferred the said power upon bifr rather than upon hon ble company .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //