Explicit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 232 results (0.012 seconds)Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Lavoie
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1986
aetna life ins co v lavoie 475 u s 813 1986 u s supreme court aetna life ins co v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Govindaraju Vs. Karnataka S.R.T.C. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC1680; (1986)IILLJ351SC; 1986(1)SCALE794; (1986)3SCC273; [1986]2SCR509; 1986(2)LC542(SC)
..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.V. Bapat, I.T.O, Companies Circle, Bombay Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-1986
Reported in: AIR1987SC493; (1986)54CTR(SC)314; [1986]159ITR938(SC); 1987Supp(1)SCC595
..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarbans Lal Vs. M.L. Wadhawan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-04-1986
Reported in: AIR1987SC217; [1987]62CompCas747(SC); 1987CriLJ324; 1987(1)Crimes89(SC); 1987(12)ECC128; 1987(27)ELT584(SC); JT1986(1)SC960; 1986(2)SCALE925; (1987)1SCC151; [1987]1SCR425;
..... committed by the candidate or his polling agent or by others with the implicit or explicit consent of the candidate or his polling agent where the supporters of the candidate indulged .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCenter for Legal Research and anr. Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-02-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC1322; 1986(1)SCALE907; (1986)2SCC706; 1986(2)LC445(SC)
..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. Saksaria Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-14-1986
Reported in: AIR1986SC868; 1986(2)ARBLR14(SC); (1986)1CompLJ297(SC); 1986(1)SCALE244; (1986)2SCC145; [1986]1SCR290; 1986(1)LC742(SC)
..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArun Prasad Vs. Chairman, Selection Committee
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-05-1986
Reported in: ILR1986KAR1331; 1986(1)KarLJ384
..... cannot be construed to mean that said date is outer limit for payment since agreement explicitly stipulates that amount should be paid within 6 months from date of agreement reckonable date .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCabana Vs. Bullock
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-22-1986
..... capital murder conviction because he was an unwilling participant in the robbery homicide that court explicitly found t he evidence is overwhelming that appellant was present aiding and assisting in the ..... it assumes that the appellate court is constitutionally a proper factfinder in mata this court explicitly acknowledged that the trial court record on which the california court of appeal based its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBethel Sch. Dist. Vs. Fraser
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-07-1986
..... loco parentis to protect children especially in a captive audience from exposure to sexually explicit indecent or lewd speech we have also recognized an interest in protecting minors from ..... basic educational mission a high school assembly or classroom is no place for a sexually explicit monologue directed towards an unsuspecting audience of teenage students accordingly it was perfectly appropriate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSouth Carolina Vs. Catawba Indian Tribe
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-02-1986
..... of the catawba act the state statute of limitations did not apply held the explicit redefinition of the relationship between the federal government and respondent tribe reflected in the ..... it also emphasizes that the division of assets act as a whole represented an explicit redefinition of the relationship between the federal government and the catawbas terminating special federal protection .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial