Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 232 results (0.012 seconds)
Apr 22 1986 (FN)

Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Lavoie

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-22-1986

aetna life ins co v lavoie 475 u s 813 1986 u s supreme court aetna life ins co v...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 1986 (SC)

S. Govindaraju Vs. Karnataka S.R.T.C. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-15-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC1680; (1986)IILLJ351SC; 1986(1)SCALE794; (1986)3SCC273; [1986]2SCR509; 1986(2)LC542(SC)

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1986 (SC)

D.V. Bapat, I.T.O, Companies Circle, Bombay Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-08-1986

Reported in: AIR1987SC493; (1986)54CTR(SC)314; [1986]159ITR938(SC); 1987Supp(1)SCC595

..... the civil court is not to be readily inferred but such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied one of the corollaries flowing from the principle that the constitution .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 1986 (SC)

Harbans Lal Vs. M.L. Wadhawan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-04-1986

Reported in: AIR1987SC217; [1987]62CompCas747(SC); 1987CriLJ324; 1987(1)Crimes89(SC); 1987(12)ECC128; 1987(27)ELT584(SC); JT1986(1)SC960; 1986(2)SCALE925; (1987)1SCC151; [1987]1SCR425;

..... committed by the candidate or his polling agent or by others with the implicit or explicit consent of the candidate or his polling agent where the supporters of the candidate indulged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1986 (SC)

Center for Legal Research and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC1322; 1986(1)SCALE907; (1986)2SCC706; 1986(2)LC445(SC)

..... d g since the language of s 178 of the contract act is clear and explicit if any hardship and inconvenience is felt because such a practice of treating the receipt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 1986 (SC)

State Bank of India Vs. Saksaria Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-14-1986

Reported in: AIR1986SC868; 1986(2)ARBLR14(SC); (1986)1CompLJ297(SC); 1986(1)SCALE244; (1986)2SCC145; [1986]1SCR290; 1986(1)LC742(SC)

..... the legislation come in for consideration where the language of an act is clear and explicit the court must give effect to it whatever may be the consequence for in that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1986 (HC)

Arun Prasad Vs. Chairman, Selection Committee

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-05-1986

Reported in: ILR1986KAR1331; 1986(1)KarLJ384

..... cannot be construed to mean that said date is outer limit for payment since agreement explicitly stipulates that amount should be paid within 6 months from date of agreement reckonable date .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 1986 (FN)

Cabana Vs. Bullock

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-22-1986

..... capital murder conviction because he was an unwilling participant in the robbery homicide that court explicitly found t he evidence is overwhelming that appellant was present aiding and assisting in the ..... it assumes that the appellate court is constitutionally a proper factfinder in mata this court explicitly acknowledged that the trial court record on which the california court of appeal based its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 07 1986 (FN)

Bethel Sch. Dist. Vs. Fraser

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-07-1986

..... loco parentis to protect children especially in a captive audience from exposure to sexually explicit indecent or lewd speech we have also recognized an interest in protecting minors from ..... basic educational mission a high school assembly or classroom is no place for a sexually explicit monologue directed towards an unsuspecting audience of teenage students accordingly it was perfectly appropriate .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1986 (FN)

South Carolina Vs. Catawba Indian Tribe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-02-1986

..... of the catawba act the state statute of limitations did not apply held the explicit redefinition of the relationship between the federal government and respondent tribe reflected in the ..... it also emphasizes that the division of assets act as a whole represented an explicit redefinition of the relationship between the federal government and the catawbas terminating special federal protection .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //