Explicit - Year 1996 - Judgments

May 24 1996 (HC)

Jai Pal Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-1996

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(Delhi)429; 1996CriLJ4097; 64(1996)DLT754

mohd sharnim j 1 the case of the complainant which emerges from the evidence led by the prosecution may shortly...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 1996 (HC)

Ram Karanji More Vs. Keshardev Jalan

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jun-07-1996

Reported in: AIR1997Gau4

..... issues of law in the first instance and postpones settlement of other issues clearly and explicitly in situations where the court has framed all issues together both of law as well .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 1996 (HC)

Swatantra Singh Vs. Neel Kamal Singh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-08-1996

Reported in: I(1998)DMC720

..... issues of law in the first instance and postpones settlement of other issues clearly and explicitly in situations where the court has framed all issues together both of law as well .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 1996 (SC)

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Orai District, Jalaun Through Its Secreta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-20-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)319; 1996(7)SCALE729; (1996)11SCC541; [1996]Supp6SCR629

..... condition as to on land owner for releasing acquired land held though act does not explicitly require maintenance of green belt nodal agency can decide how much is needed for maintenance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 1996 (SC)

K. Dayanandalal and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-07-1996

Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)40; JT1996(7)SC532; 1996(5)SCALE630; (1996)9SCC728; [1996]Supp4SCR329; 1996(3)SLJ139(SC)

..... service commission been to consider 31 3 2003 as cut off date it would have explicitly specified so hence high court erred in considering 31 3 2003 as a cut off .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 1996 (SC)

Union of India and Others Vs. Keshab Lal Roy and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-09-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIAD(SC)318; AIR1996SC3529; [1996(74)FLR2390]; JT1996(7)SC694; 1996LabIC2525; (1997)ILLJ712SC; 1996(6)SCALE404; (1996)10SCC326; [1996]Supp5SCR611; 1997(31)SLJ1(SC)

..... instrument in evidence objects reasons held when meaning of provision of statute is clear and explicit it is not necessary to advert to objects and reasons of statutes malhotra learned senior .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 1996 (SC)

Rama Shankar<br>and<br>ranbir Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-03-1996

Reported in: AIR1996SC3532; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)696; 1996CriLJ4166; JT1996(7)SC651; 1996(6)SCALE326

..... instrument in evidence objects reasons held when meaning of provision of statute is clear and explicit it is not necessary to advert to objects and reasons of statutes modi pw 1 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1996 (SC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. S.S. Akolkar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-25-1996

Reported in: AIR1996SC1984; JT1996(2)SC286; 1996(4)KarLJ799; 1996(2)SCALE130; (1996)2SCC568; [1996]1SCR989; 1996(1)LC758(SC)

..... plain and clear where the language of the act or the rules is clear and explicit the words of the statute alone represents the intention of the legislature the high court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1996 (SC)

U.P. Shiksha and Education Board Vs. Rajender Prasad Gupta

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-1996

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)319; AIR1996SC1336; JT1996(3)SC378; 1996(2)SCALE908; (1996)3SCC598; [1996]2SCR1053; 1996(1)LC815(SC); (1996)3UPLBEC1615

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 1996 (SC)

Karan Singh Vs. State (Delhi Admn.)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-10-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)87; AIR1997SC1508; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)207; 1997CriLJ736; 1996(4)Crimes182(SC); JT1996(9)SC736; 1996(7)SCALE697; (1996)11SCC274; [1996]Supp7SCR405

..... before a duly enacted law can be judicially nullified it must be forbidden by some explicit restriction in the constitution the attitude of judicial humility which this consideration enjoins is not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explicit - Judgment Search Results