Skip to content


Explicit - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicit Page 1 of about 319 results (0.065 seconds)
Mar 10 2004 (TRI)

Cce Vs. Explicit Trading and Marketing

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC679

..... 2003 by which the commissioner appeals has allowed modvat credit to the respondents m s explicit trading amp marketing p ltd 2 when the matter was called noone was present on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Lal Bahadur and Ors

Court: Delhi

..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Chand Verma and Ors

Court: Delhi

..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Sharma Prasad and Ors

Court: Delhi

..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 2015 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Phool Babu and Ors

Court: Delhi

..... new delhi date of decision march 27 2015 lpa4752014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... vijay chandra jha and ms sonia sharma advocate lpa5042014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and ..... and ms sonia sharma advocate for r 2 lpa5052014 m s explicit leathers represented by appellant mr sameer jain mr ekank mehra and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2014 (HC)

M/S Explicit Leathers Vs. Arvind Kumar and ors

Court: Delhi

..... for r1 w p c 1014 2014 cm no 2067 2014 m s explicit leathers petitioner through mr sandeep bajaj mr siddharth jain mr sameer jain ..... for gnctd w p c 1015 2014 cm no 2069 2014 m s explicit leathers petitioner through mr sandeep bajaj mr siddharth jain mr sameer jain ..... for gnctd w p c 1110 2014 cm no 2311 2014 m s explicit leathers petitioner through mr sandeep bajaj mr siddharth jain mr sameer jain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2002 (FN)

Ashcroft Vs. Free Speech Coalition

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the cpp a computer generated images virtually indistinguishable from real children engaged in sexually explicit conduct neither actual conduct nor simulated conduct however is properly construed to reach ..... promoted as conveying the impression that they depict actual minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct do not escape regulation merely because they might warrant first amendment protection .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 2024 (SC)

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... unless the context otherwise requires da child pornography means any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a child which include photograph video digital or computer generated image ..... is that he downloaded and enjoyed material depicting children in obscene indecent and sexually explicit manner from the application called telegram in order to attract the offence under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 19 2024 (SC)

Apoorva Arora Vs. State (govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... be investigated and prosecuted for production transmission and online publication of obscene and sexually explicit material under sections 67 and 67a of the information technology act 20003 the appellants ..... the publication and transmission of pornographic material that depicts sexual acts or contains sexually explicit conduct that falls short of actual depiction of sexual acts since the alleged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 1973 (SC)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... the inference that natural rights were either recognised by it explicitly or implicitly and if so whether any of such rights were ..... petitioner on inherent limitations is that if the text is explicit it is conclusive alike in what it directs and what it ..... the consequences of a particular construction if the text be explicit can have no impact on the construction of a constitutional provision attorney .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //