Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 329 results (0.017 seconds)Kranth Sangram Parishath, Represented by Its State Convenor, Y. Shanka ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-1992
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT99
which we have extracted above we do not propose to multiply such instances 51 one of the files which were handed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPappu Subbarao Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-30-1992
Reported in: (1992)43ITD204(Hyd.)
section 139 4 of the act it is unnecessary to multiply decisions on this point therefore we hold that since the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpecial Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Vs. Tekumallavaraha Narasim ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)ALT721
argued by sri rajgopal reddy that 6 or 7 times multiplier can be granted in fact this court is of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdvani Oerlikon Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-27-1992
Reported in: 1993(42)ECC219; 1993(63)ELT427(Mad)
corporation and others air1986sc180 while we do not propose to multiply the authorities we may here indicate the basic namely that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNallappa Gounder Vs. Lakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-02-1992
Reported in: AIR1993Mad78
also the same view has been expressed we need not multiply the authorities on this proposition if we take into consideration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Sahida Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-19-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN336
he had already sought the same 20 i need not multiply rulings on this point and suffice it to say that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Trawelers Association Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-18-1992
Reported in: (1993)IILLJ11Ker
of lack of legislative competency we do not want to multiply the decisions on this aspect of the matter we are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSikander @ Mohd. Shafi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-1992
Reported in: 1992(2)Crimes970; 1992(24)DRJ295; ILR1993Delhi40
prosecution to examine each and every witness so as to multiply witnesses and burden the record this rule however does not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Mukherjee Vs. University Grants Commission and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-07-1992
Reported in: 47(1992)DLT388
become more acute recently on account of the tendency to multiply universities 3 the university grants commission has the power under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India and Others Vs. Surya Phosphate Ltd. and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-12-1992
Reported in: AIR1993SC1620; 1992(2)BLJR1292; JT1992(4)SC481; 1992(2)SCALE159; (1992)4SCC1; [1992]3SCR817; 1992(2)LC620(SC)
subsidy on the basis of the unwarranted cost one can multiply such instances with reference to each of the other elements
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial