Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 107 results (0.015 seconds)State of Kerala Vs. C. Moidoo
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-26-1971
Reported in: [1972]29STC373(Ker)
two decisions of the supreme court it is unnecessary to multiply more decisions but we may refer to a full bench
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Gift-tax, Patiala Vs. Taj Nath.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-1971
Reported in: [1972]86ITR96(P& H)
learned counsel for the department it is not necessary to multiply authorities the line is sharply drawn between alienations by way
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Gift-tax Vs. Tej Nath
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-09-1971
Reported in: (1972)74PLR1
counsel for the department 44 it is not necessary to multiply authorities the line is sharply drawn between alienations by way
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmar Singh Modi Lal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-25-1971
Reported in: AIR1972P& H356
the source of all the difficulty it is unnecessary to multiply further english authorities as the view above said seems to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWyman Vs. James
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-12-1971
are entering moreover as the numbers of functionaries and inspectors multiply the need for protection of the individual becomes page 400
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovinda Marar Vs. Sivarama Kurup
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-29-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Ker68
of lis pendens it is not necessary here also to multiply authorities on this point excepting to refer also to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtma Ram Vs. Paras Ram and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-23-1971
Reported in: AIR1971HP11
the statute of limitation 15 there is no need to multiply authorities on this question i therefore cannot accept the submission
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Kumar Samaddar Vs. the Superintendent, Hooghly Jail and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-23-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Cal35,1972CriLJ244,75CWN751
the cases on the point of vagueness we need not multiply the number the test is now well settled in the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTW.H. Deeth and Company and anr. Vs. the Assistant Commercial Tax Offic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-22-1971
Reported in: [1973]30STC233(Mad)
be onward export to foreign countries it is easy to multiply instances where goods can pass check posts without being the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJegannatham Pillai Vs. Kunjithapatham Pillai and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-20-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Mad390
s 14 1 of that act it is unnecessary to multiply such instances and it is enough to point out that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial