Skip to content


Multiple - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 100 results (0.014 seconds)
Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Basant Singh and ors. Vs. Dhan Singh

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1886)ILR8All519

the killing ten more in the same day will not multiply the offence or the penalty imposed by the statute for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 1969 (HC)

Dinkar Keshav Bedbkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-24-1969

Reported in: (1969)71BOMLR867; 1970MhLJ364

be an order of dismissal 20 it is needless to multiply authorities for the position emerging from these decisions is very

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1969 (HC)

Sardar Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-26-1969

Reported in: 1969CriLJ1324; 1969()WLN87

of the proceeding would be invalid it is needless to multiply the authorities which uniformly hold that the word shall is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1969 (HC)

Gela Hira Rabari Vs. S.V. Pandya and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-05-1969

Reported in: AIR1970Guj235; 1970CriLJ1475

of the milk which ends in putrification that the bacteria multiply more rapidly at high temperature and the bacteria most commonly

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 1969 (HC)

Mathai Ouseph Panackal Vs. Joseph and anr.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-21-1969

Reported in: AIR1970Ker261

high court also 7 there is no more need to multiply precedents except to state that in air 1960 mad 244

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 1969 (HC)

Brijmohini Vs. Surinder Chadha

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-03-1969

Reported in: ILR1969Delhi1042

with an intact hymen 11 it is nto necessary to multiply citations in this behalf both the learned counsels also relied

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1969 (SC)

V. Venugopala Ravi Varma Rajah Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-1969

Reported in: AIR1969SC1094; [1969]74ITR49(SC); (1969)1SCC681; [1969]3SCR827

classification is clearly unreasonable and arbitrary it is unnecessary to multiply citations 17 the parliament has declared for the purpose of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 1969 (SC)

N. Venugopala Ravi Varma Rajah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-1969

Reported in: (1969)1SCC681a

is clearly unreasonable and arbitrary rdquo it is unnecessary to multiply citations 17 the parliament has declared for the purpose of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1969 (HC)

income-tax Officer Vs. S.B. Singar Singh and Sons and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-05-1969

Reported in: [1970]75ITR646(All)

execute an inoperative order 23 it is not necessary to multiply authorities it appears to us that the law is well

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1969 (SC)

Mohd. HusaIn Umar Kochra Etc. Vs. K.S. Dalipsinghji and anr. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-31-1969

Reported in: AIR1970SC45; (1970)72BOMLR774; 1970CriLJ9; (1969)3SCC429; [1970]1SCR130

..... it would not be correct to contend that the theory of nexus might lead to multiple taxation or obstruct inter state trade article 286 2 of the constitution and the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //