Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 175 results (0.009 seconds)Awadh Kumar Shukla Vs. Superintendent of Central Jail and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-23-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ192
and then apply the law it will be needless to multiply the citations as laid down in satpal s case 1981
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArvind Mills Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Jun-08-1982
Reported in: (1982)1ITD872(Ahd.)
cannot be allowed as a deduction it is unnecessary to multiply other decisions on the general principle 11 in the above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurta Singh Vs. Pritam Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-25-1982
Reported in: AIR1983P& H114
baliram air 1953 bom 424 13 it seems unnecessary to multiply authorities or to quote extensively therefrom it suffices to mention
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaghar Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-01-1982
Reported in: 1982WLN(UC)502
has urged it was not obligatory on the prosecution to multiply the numbers of witnesses to narrate the same facts 17
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVenkitaraman Vs. Labour Court and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-02-1982
Reported in: (1982)ILLJ454Ker
work is supervisory in nature it is not necessary to multiply decisions in this regard the heart of the matter is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalicut Modern Spg. and Wvg. Mills Ltd. Vs. Regional P.F. Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-17-1982
Reported in: (1982)ILLJ440Ker
of every month we do not think it necessary to multiply citations the principle is settled that the initial obligation to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohn Joseph Vs. University of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-08-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Ker52
was noticed in another case there is no need to multiply illustrations this being the state of affairs it will be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshok Leyland Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-1982
Reported in: 23(1983)DLT278; 1983(4)DRJ118; 1983RLR519
chassis and while awarding the claim it has to be multiplied by 105 the question was whether the arbitrator was conscious
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsha Rani and ors. Vs. Union of India
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-26-1982
Reported in: AIR1982P& H435; [1984]56CompCas268(P& H)
held that both the interest theory and the method of multiplying the annual dependency for the remaining years of life expectancy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.M. Mutusamy Vs. the Commissioner, Panchayat Union and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-10-1982
Reported in: (1983)2MLJ271
india referred to above 6 we do not want to multiply citations and as we have already stated above we are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial