Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1976 Page 1 of about 128 results (0.014 seconds)Ramesh Chandra Vs. Randhir Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-07-1976
Reported in: AIR1977All330
no help to the appellant 28 it is needless to multiply cases it should be sufficient to say that each case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSankalchand Himatlal Sheth Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-04-1976
Reported in: (1976)17GLR1017
nor strengthen judiciary in such a short time we can multiply this illustration in mass transfers undertaken for the first time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarimi Banamali Padhano Vs. Gulasu Lakhano and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Nov-19-1976
Reported in: AIR1977Ori128; 43(1977)CLT293
barred by constructive res judicata 11 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities the position clearly appears to be that if the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Mubarik Shah Naqshbandi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-20-1976
Reported in: [1977]110ITR217(J& K)
section 148 of the act it is not necessary to multiply the examples of procedural sections which are however mandatory in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarwan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-11-1976
Reported in: AIR1976SC2304,1976CriLJ1757,(1976)4SCC369
the case it is not necessary for the prosecution to multiply witnesses after witnesses on the same point it is the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTL. K. Shaik Mohammed Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-1976
Reported in: [1978]112ITR622(Mad)
briefly referred to the lacuna in the order as to multiply such situations would serve no better purposes in the result
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Venkatesa Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras-ii.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-18-1976
Reported in: [1978]111ITR562(Mad)
34 1 b of the act it is unnecessary to multiply authorities in this behalf in view of the legal position
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Sathya Rao (Minor, Represented by Father and Guardian U.N.R. Rao) ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-1976
Reported in: (1977)2MLJ403
3 subjects of group i 35 it is unnecessary to multiply instances and we are referring to all these matters only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTirlochan Singh Vs. Chander Badan Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-1976
Reported in: ILR1976Delhi149
case of entry wounds it would be needless to further multiply citations 38 the learned counsel for the complainant referred to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLonankutty Vs. Thomman and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-15-1976
Reported in: AIR1976SC1645; (1976)3SCC528; [1976]SuppSCR74; 1976(8)LC550(SC)
eater the land with the high tide they breed and multiply on the land and the water white receding leaves the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial