Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 338 results (0.012 seconds)Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Swan Mills Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-25-1989
Reported in: (1989)(25)LC244Tri(Delhi)
respondents received yarn from outside parties for making it into multiply yarn ranging from 4 ply upto 25 ply yarn and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA. Sanyasi Rao and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-07-1989
Reported in: (1989)77CTR(AP)40; [1989]178ITR31(AP)
encapsules the law on the subject it is unnecessary to multiply the authorities learned counsel for the petitioners however placed strong
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConsumer Unity and Trust Society Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-1989
Reported in: (1989)2CALLT179(HC)
the said institute opines that probably one would have to multiply by a factor of 5 to 6 to arrive at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeeraj Raj Garg Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-06-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)WLN262
proceed in the manner they are proceeding cases would further multiply and there would be no end to it hence the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Babu Vs. Chief Engineer (Ps and Gl) and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-08-1989
Reported in: (1990)ILLJ502Ker
this regard are a legion i do not propose to multiply authority on this point it is sufficient for me to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.K. Wariyar Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-02-1989
Reported in: AIR1990Ker218
obstruction has a cause of action it is unnecessary to multiply authorities or precedent 15 by a long line of decisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNitIn Gunwant Shah Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs (Presentive)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-1989
Reported in: 40(1990)DLT575; 1990(26)ECC176; 1990(47)ELT299(Del)
code of criminal procedure 6 it is not necessary to multiply the judgments holding the same principle which has been referred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVij Resins Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-12-1989
Reported in: AIR1989SC1629; 1989(1)SCALE1303; (1989)3SCC115; [1989]3SCR257; 1989(2)LC325(SC)
clear of the constitutional inhibitions it is not necessary to multiply precedents as we have already pointed out section 3 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanthimathy Plantation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-19-1989
Reported in: 1989(2)SCALE665; (1989)4SCC650a
court which support this view but it is unnecessary to multiply authorities to support the obvious proposition 6 the appeal fails
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanthimathy Plantation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-19-1989
Reported in: [1989]Supp1SCR206; 1990(1)LC270(SC)
court which support this view but it is unnecessary to multiply authorities to support the obvious proposition 7 the appeal fails
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial