Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 93 results (0.011 seconds)Sri Ramakrishna theatre Vs. Chief Revenue Controlling Authority
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-16-1962
Reported in: AIR1962Kant266; AIR1962Mys266; ILR1962KAR396
v lakshmipat singhania air1958all417 sb it is not necessary to multiply the decisions in support of this principle since no decision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuppa Viswapathi Vs. Kuppa Venkata Krishna Sastry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1962
Reported in: AIR1963AP9
188 air 1922 lah 380 2 it is unnecessary to multiply citations on this topic suffice it to say that an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta Vs. Ghasiram Srinivas.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-30-1962
Reported in: [1963]50ITR224(Cal)
1938 21 tax cas 608 it is however unnecessary to multiply cases that being the legal test to be applied let
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishorilal Dutta Vs. P.K. Mukherjee
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-05-1962
Reported in: AIR1964Cal131,67CWN772
immaturity of the accountant it would not be necessary to multiply the points further as we should impose the penalty in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. Vs. Miss Velma Williams
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-14-1962
Reported in: AIR1964Cal94,(1965)ILLJ632Cal
the master s roof 22 it is not necessary to multiply authorities but having regard to the importance of the question
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath Agarwala Vs. B.N. Dutta and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-29-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Cal26
be imported under part v 25 it is unnecessary to multiply instances and these are all or nearly all the items
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.M. Subramaniam Vs. N. Sundaram Iyer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-13-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Mad217; (1963)IMLJ113
this circumstance and grant relief it would be pedantry to multiply instances the discretion of the court under its inherent powers
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShah Shantilal Chunilal Vs. Shah Shantilal Fulchand and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Aug-30-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Guj195; (1963)GLR698
where the result of non interference will be only to multiply proceedings by driving the party to a suit in which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPapavinasom Subrahmoniam Vs. Daivani Nagaramma and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-07-1962
Reported in: AIR1963Ker26
not the least being that it would be certain to multiply indefinitely the mass of those very perjuries falsehoods and frauds
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPearey Lal Vs. Rameshwar Das
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-10-1962
Reported in: AIR1963SC1703; [1963]Supp2SCR834
its true shade of meaning it is not necessary to multiply decisions as the expression malik has been consistently understood by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial