Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 321 results (0.01 seconds)Collector of Central Excise and Vs. Allied Computers and ors.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-25-1987
Reported in: (1987)(13)ECC87
to those of an adding machine it can add subtract multiply divide and list but in addition it can make decisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuntupalli Rama Subbayya Vs. Guntupalli Rajamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-1987
Reported in: AIR1988AP226
of such an interpretation it may not be necessary to multiply the decisions suffice it to say that these two decisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Allied Computers
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-1987
Reported in: (1987)(13)LC379Tri(Delhi)
with computer at all the machine cannot even add substract multiply or divide numericals 8 amp 9 which are the fundamental
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMamtaj Gaffar Mulla and ors. Vs. Vilas Beedi Factory and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-28-1987
Reported in: ILR1987KAR3282; (1988)IILLJ128Kant
k of the industrial disputes act it is unnecessary to multiply the precedents where a dispute between employees and employer manufacturing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhavan Vs. Kannammal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-1987
Reported in: (1989)1MLJ136
possibly result to the defendant it is not necessary to multiply the authorities on this aspect of the matter 10 the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFood Inspector, Thakazhy Panchayat Vs. P. Viswanatha Pillai
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-05-1987
Reported in: 1988CriLJ323
live organism by the passing of time the organism may multiply and cause the food item defective for analysis the time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannathan Pillai Vs. Kunjithapadam Pillai and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-21-1987
Reported in: AIR1987SC1493; JT1987(2)SC235; (1987)2MLJ1(SC); 1987(1)SCALE861; (1987)2SCC572; [1987]2SCR1070; 1987(2)LC690(SC)
the property in any other capacity it is needless to multiply instances i am therefore clearly of the opinion that there
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAndhra Kesari Educational Society and Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-1987
Reported in: AIR1988AP256
nadu it would not be it is not necessary to multiply the instances these are the several anomalies and abuses which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vazir Sultan Tobacco Co. Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-24-1987
Reported in: [1988]169ITR139(AP)
hence it constituted revenue expenditure 5 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities on this aspect it is for this reason only
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Padma Timber Depot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-25-1987
Reported in: (1987)67CTR(AP)109; [1987]169ITR647(AP)
a return 11 we do not consider it necessary to multiply authorities on this point as we do not find that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial