Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1994 Page 1 of about 448 results (0.037 seconds)Sri Surendra Kumar Gupta Vs. State of U.P. Through the Secretary, Loca ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-11-1994
Reported in: AIR1994All349
object may not become futile it is not necessary to multiply cases on this point as it is accepted view of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKillick Industries Ltd. Vs. Thimmaiah Ramachandran
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-29-1994
Reported in: ILR1994KAR1957; 1994(3)KarLJ87
its judgment which reads as follows it is unnecessary to multiply the citations as we do not find any other decision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Smt. Jyoti Kaul and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-18-1994
Reported in: 1995ACJ608; AIR1995MP108
of the claimant whichever is higher the ascertainment of the multiplicand is a more difficult exercise indeed many factors have to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Hari Singhania and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth- ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-16-1994
Reported in: AIR1994SC1355; (1994)118CTR(SC)125; [1994]207ITR1(SC); JT1994(2)SC6; 1994(1)SCALE644; 1994Supp(3)SCC46; [1994]1SCR1033
up equity share capital as shown in the balance sheet multiply the resultant amount thus obtained by the paid up value
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPramilla Puri and ors. Vs. Rajinder Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-1994
Reported in: 1995ACJ792; 1994IIIAD(Delhi)861; 55(1994)DLT284
no interest is allowed on the total figure however the multiplier is a figure considerably less than the number of years
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCochIn Plantations Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Agric ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-03-1994
Reported in: [1994]210ITR91(Ker)
v nanalal tribhovandas 1975 100itr734 guj it is unnecessary to multiply authorities the law remains well settled that a the service
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHakru Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-25-1994
Reported in: 1994CriLJ2141; 1994(1)WLN572
of the occurrence as such there was no necessity to multiply the evidence by producing the aforesaid three persons particularly when
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Verda Ram and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-22-1994
Reported in: 1995ACJ200; 1995(3)WLC313
and the life expectancy is 70 years this method would multiply the loss of dependency for 45 years virtually adopting a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSreenivas Shenoy Vs. Vasudeva Shenoy
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-17-1994
Reported in: ILR1994KAR1102; 1994(2)KarLJ517
held among other things as under it is unnecessary to multiply the citations as we do not find any other decision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJalba Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-04-1994
Reported in: 1995(2)BomCR575; II(1994)DMC588
recorded that it was not necessary for the prosecution to multiply the witnesses after witnesses on the same point because it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial