Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 299 results (0.024 seconds)Prithvichand Ramchand Sablok Vs. S.Y. Shinde
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-16-1985
Reported in: AIR1985Bom297; 1985(2)BomCR200; (1985)87BOMLR111; 1985MhLJ199
per the consent terms 24 it is not necessary to multiply the authorities because ultimately as i have already indicated in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Smt. V.T. Naresh and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-1985
Reported in: 1985(9)DRJ173; (1986)ILLJ323Del
relation to any law relating to establishment it need not multiply the instances only one is sufficient to make the act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.B. Manufacturing Company Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-1985
Reported in: (1986)(6)LC594Tri(Delhi)
turn that appliance into a mechanical contrivance we need not multiply examples since it is clear that electronic gas lighters of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGulab Chand Prasad Vs. Budhwanti and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-22-1985
Reported in: AIR1985Pat327; 1985(33)BLJR3181985
effect to with their full rigour it is unnecessary to multiply authority on a point which seems plain on principle and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMacneill and Magor Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mouhsen Ali and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-21-1985
Reported in: AIR1985Cal460
be that as it may it will only prolong and multiply proceedings if this suit is allowed to be brought to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSukh Pal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-03-1985
Reported in: 1985(2)WLN603
cited certain authorities also but we do not want to multiply our judgment by further authority 18 mr gupta learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commercial Taxes Officer (Revisions) and anr. Vs. Arawali As ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-05-1985
Reported in: [1985]60STC349(Raj); 1985(2)WLN16
case 1982 tax lr 3114 and do not propose to multiply authorities in support of the view taken therein 10 after
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.N. Sreedharan Vs. Bhaskaran
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-01-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Ker49
to construe the decree in such a way as to multiply litigation 11 it is appropriate at this stage to quote
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank of Baroda, Ahmedabad Vs. Rabari Bachubhai Hirabhai and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-11-1985
Reported in: AIR1987Guj1; (1986)1GLR144
or documents are to hand it is not necessary to multiply by quoting from various other dictionaries or decided cases as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPratibha Rani Vs. Suraj Kumar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-12-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC628; 1985CriLJ817; 1985(1)Crimes614(SC); [1985]155ITR190(SC); 1985(1)SCALE458; (1985)2SCC370; [1985]3SCR191
is not maintainable it is not necessary for us to multiply cases on this point on which there does not appear
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial