Skip to content


Multiple - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 171 results (0.01 seconds)
Dec 30 1981 (SC)

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-30-1981

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

article 222 233 it is not necessary for us to multiply authorities on the subject covered by category a because the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1981 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Manorma and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-11-1981

Reported in: 1981WLN(UC)372

will therefore reassess the compensation on the basis of the multiplier method 29 for applying the multiplier method it would be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1981 (FN)

Delta Air Lines, Inc. Vs. August

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-09-1981

be the amount of time reasonably expended on the matter multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate the lodestar is subject to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1981 (HC)

Sahebzadi Amina Marzia Vs. Syed Mohd. HussaIn and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-25-1981

Reported in: AIR1981AP340

1919 bom 119 supra 22 we do not want to multiply the decision on this aspect of the case 23 learned

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 1981 (HC)

Chikkala Samuel Vs. District Educational Officer, Hyderabad and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-1981

Reported in: AIR1982AP64

nadu it would not be it is not necessary to multiply the instances these are the several anomalies and abuses which

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 1981 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Manzoor Ahmad and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Sep-11-1981

and air 1958 punj 490 and it is futile to multiply the authorities 18 the law laid down in the aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 1981 (HC)

Jaswant Singh Multani Vs. Sub-divisional Officer (Civil) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-16-1981

Reported in: AIR1982P& H69

to the highest executive authority it would be unnecessary to multiply authorities on the point and it suffices to say that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1981 (HC)

Cheru Ouseph Vs. Kunjipathumma

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-13-1981

Reported in: AIR1981Ker266

of an age of intensive government and in particular they multiply under the welfare state the movement of progressive society nowadays

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 1981 (HC)

Thoma Varkey Etc. Vs. Krishnan Nair Narayanan Nair and ors. Etc.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-31-1981

Reported in: AIR1981Ker228

in view of this pronouncement there is no need to multiply authorities which discountenance a reconsideration of ilr 1978 2 ker

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1981 (HC)

Chandhok (Lajwanti) Vs. Chandhok (O.N.)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-26-1981

Reported in: ILR1982Delhi689; 1981RLR619

m l jain j 1 the chandhoka were married on 27 2 1944 at peshawar in 1947 they migrated to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //