Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 441 results (0.016 seconds)V. Guruviah Naidu and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-1995
Reported in: [1995]216ITR156(Mad)
1995 215itr176 mad as follow it is not necessary to multiply and add to the authorities already cited the judgments of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shakuntla Devi and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-28-1995
Reported in: 1(1996)ACC1
interest is 5 per annum and not 10 then the multiplier needed to capitalise the loss of the annual dependency at
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowreah Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-22-1995
Reported in: (1996)1CALLT397(HC),1996(86)ELT28(Cal)
no assistance to him 24 it is not necessary to multiply decisions as recently the aspect of the matter has been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Urmila Bharuka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: [1999]97CompCas16(Cal)
quantity of the evidence 103 it is not necessary to multiply the decisions inasmuch as recently the supreme court in tata
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Guruviah Naidu and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-03-1995
Reported in: (1996)130CTR(Mad)189
1995 215itr176 mad as follow it is not necessary to multiply and add to the authorities already cited the judgments of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.D. Swami and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-14-1995
Reported in: [1995]216ITR129(Mad)
substance in this contention 6 it is not necessary to multiply and add to the authorities already cited the judgments of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOuchakalai Vs. Secretary to Government, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Prohibiti ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-28-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ1517
pradesh 1987 cri l j 34 it is unnecessary to multiply the decisions suffice it to observe that the representation made
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat and ors. Vs. Shahenazbanu Ashrafali
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-13-1995
Reported in: 1997ACJ176; AIR1996Guj136
enters the body by way of the mouth begins to multiply in the oropharynx and lower part of the intestinal tract
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of M.P. and ors. Vs. Hukum Chand Mills Karamchari
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-27-1995
Reported in: (1996)7SCC81
scc cri 422 we do not find any necessity to multiply the case law6 the reliance on section 24 a of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarala Devi and ors. Vs. Daya Ram and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-1995
Reported in: 60(1995)DLT3; 1995(35)DRJ36
in several other judgments but it is not necessary to multiply the same 13 it is not disputed by the learned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial