Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 231 results (0.044 seconds)Collector of Central Excise Vs. Multiple Fabrics Co. (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-1983
Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT299TriDel
..... came up for hearing on 10 10 83 alongwith the appeal filed by m s multiple fabrics co p ltd the respondents in the present matter against an order passed by ..... 11 83 relating to an appeal filed by the respondents in this case m s multiple fabrics co p ltd against the appellant in this case namely the collector of central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMultiple Fabrics Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-1983
Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT301TriDel
..... to the goods under consideration 5 appearing before us for the appellants namely m s multiple fabric co ltd shri r n banerjee their learned counsel placed heavy reliance on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBagalkot Udyog Limited Vs. Minal Surendra Patel (Smt.) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-22-1983
Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR593
house or being required to shift it is unnecessary to multiply the ratios since the undercurrent is common to the effect
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanjit Singh Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-07-1983
Reported in: AIR1983P& H308
of the annual income of the fruit bearing trees by multiplying the same by 15 to 20 years or by determining
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwa Mitter of Vijay Bharat Cigarette Stores, Dalhousie Road, Pathan ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-30-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC5; 1984CriLJ1; 1983(2)Crimes834(SC); (1983)4SCC701; [1984]1SCR176
central government in that behalf it is not necessary to multiply the illustration 5 it is thus crystal clear that anyone
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Shrimant Govindrao Narayanrao Ghorpade
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-03-1983
Reported in: 1983(2)BomCR487
court under section 18 is concerned it is unnecessary to multiply the authorities we called upon the learned government pleader to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Photographic Co. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Saumitra Mohan Kumar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-09-1983
Reported in: (1984)ILLJ471Cal
be too frequently ignored as the legal and factual complications multiply the sophistication of procedural rights may grow exponentially a lawyer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-i Vs. M. Uttama Reddy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-1983
Reported in: [1984]148ITR580(Mad)
of the heads of agreement 14 it is needless to multiply quotations from the tribunal s order we are satisfied that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatel Maganbhai Bapujibhai and ors. Vs. Patel Ishwarbhai Motibhai and ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Apr-20-1983
Reported in: 1985ACJ867; AIR1984Guj69
are equally responsible it is not necessary for us to multiply authorities on the point save and except referring to one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. United Carbon (i) Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-31-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD363(Mum.)
distillery 1978 115 itr 34 it is not necessary to multiply the authorities on this point suffice it to say that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial