Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1951 Page 1 of about 36 results (0.01 seconds)Shankar Nathu Vs. Gangaram Nathu and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-27-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Bom127; (1952)54BOMLR75; ILR1952Bom485
act causing the death of the party we need not multiply illustrations of this type it is only those rights which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovind Balkrishna and ors. Vs. Ramchandra Rajaram and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-04-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Bom395; (1952)54BOMLR263; ILR1952Bom621
the case before us and there is no need to multiply authorities on this point which arises for our consideration we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Lewis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-26-1951
money many inequities are inherent in the income tax we multiply them needlessly by nice distinctions which have no place in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMt. Girraj Kunwar Vs. Irfan Ali and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-12-1951
Reported in: AIR1952All686
immunities or appendages is claimed it is not necessary to multiply authorities but i may usefully refer to the case of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandar Das Vs. Malla and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-10-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Raj136
the earlier case was upheld it is not necessary to multiply cases 4 the fact that the order of acquittal was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmmireddi Sooramma Vs. Ammireddi Venkataratnam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-24-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Mad166; (1951)2MLJ664
in the mother s womb it is not necessary to multiply cases it cannot be disputed that under the hindu law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRelam Subba Naicker Avergal, (Died) and anr. Vs. Sundarabala Kathiresa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-28-1951
Reported in: AIR1954Mad158; (1952)IIMLJ752
section 14 limitation act 23 it is not necessary to multiply authorities on this part of the case 24 this leads
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRm. Nl. Ramaswami Chettiar and ors. Vs. the Official Receiver, Represe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-24-1951
Reported in: AIR1951Mad1051; (1951)2MLJ479
proceed in due course of law it is unnecessary to multiply authorities though it may be useful to refer to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPresident of F. 1250 Chowghat Firka P.C.C. Co-operative Society Ltd., ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-16-1951
Reported in: AIR1953Mad996; (1952)IMLJ459
necessary for me in the view 1 have taken to multiply the authorities or to refer to those that have been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.K. Chandra Vs. the State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-03-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Bom177; (1951)53BOMLR928; ILR1952Bom540
..... of more than one offence in the same trial and thus multiplicity of trials could be avoided these circumstances are mentioned in sections ..... accused should be faced in one trial with such a bewildering multiplicity of charges but that result must necessarily follow if we were ..... of the code i realise that this view might lead to multiplicity of prosecutions which could be avoided in a few cases without .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial