Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 322 results (0.01 seconds)Sri Srinivasa Multiple Industries Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-1991
Reported in: 1996(56)ECC110
orderkanakaraj j 1 the petitioner is the same in all the four writ petitions and it is a partnership firm...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.V. Ramachandra Rao Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-1991
Reported in: ILR1991KAR2920; 1991(2)KarLJ505
ordermohan c j 1 all these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order since they question the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajasthan State R.T.C. and ors. Vs. Kiran Lata and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-23-1991
Reported in: 2(1993)ACC208
earning the same amount dies at the age of 35 multiplier of 25 years will be reasonable but whereas a person
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBilaluddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Assam
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Mar-14-1991
is sufficient to base conviction it is not necessary to multiply witnesses quality is the factor to count than quantity where
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGoa Bottling Company Private Limited Vs. Pradeep Sardesai and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-06-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)BomCR297; [1992(65)FLR279]; (1995)IIILLJ280Bom
k roy air 1969 sc 1238 it is unnecessary to multiply decisions dealing with the same aspect in the present case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.K. Thirunarayana Iyengar Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-1991
Reported in: ILR1991KAR4070; 1991(3)KarLJ395
superannuated authorities are legion and it is not necessary to multiply authorities in view of the authoritative pronouncements by the supreme
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBank of India Vs. M/S Mehta Brothers and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-1991
Reported in: ILR1991Delhi374
1 to 5 intact 44 it is not necessary to multiply judgments on this point and at this stage itself reference
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.K. JaIn and Others Vs. C.K. Shah and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-1991
Reported in: AIR1991SC1289; 1991CriLJ1347a; 1991(2)Crimes94(SC); [1991(62)FLR657]; (1991)2GLR910; JT1991(2)SC52; (1995)IIILLJ300bSC; 1991(1)SCALE519; (1991)2SCC495; [1991]1SCR938a
circumstances 33 we feel it may not be necessary to multiply the authorities on this aspect in this background if we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdithela Immanuel Raju and anr. Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-17-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ243
interested witnesses there was no necessity for the prosecution to multiply witnesses on that count the evidence of p w 47
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSk. Sakaout and ors. Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-11-1991
Reported in: 1992(I)OLR89
several decisions were cited before me it is unnecessary to multiply suffice it for me to refer a decision of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial