Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 463 results (3.603 seconds)Jagdish Chander Malhotra Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-24-1997
Reported in: (1998)62TTJ(Del)314
position of a declaratory clarificatory act it is necessary to multiply the authorities on this point we have thereforee no hesitation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChander Alias Chandra Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-12-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ2374
must be supported by reasons it is not unnecessary to multiply the authorities which have settled the law in our country
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManikant Pathak and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Mar-19-1997
be issued to it 14 it is not necessary to multiply decisions on the point as to whether government corporations companies
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSt. theresa's High School and Anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra throug ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-28-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)BomCR499
1991 m l j 864 it is not necessary to multiply the authorities mr menezes further submits that in the present
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.B. Kariyappa Vs. N.G.E.F. Limited, Bangalore and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-07-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)KarLJ673
subject are a legion and i see no need to multiply authority reference to mrs shilpi bose and others v state
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.N. Swamy, Labour Liberation Front, Mahaboobnagar Vs. Station House O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALD755; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)283; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)411
above principle in latter cases it is not necessary to multiply the case law the principle laid down in the above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Fire Protection Systems Ltd. Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Trust and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-1997
Reported in: AIR1998AP66
construction i ltd 1997 1scc738 there is no need to multiply and refer to all the decisions on the subject the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Ghanshyam Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-03-1997
Reported in: 1998(3)ALD54
taking any decision has come up with this letter to multiply the miseries of the petitioner if there is any sincerity
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHyder MohiuddIn Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-09-1997
Reported in: 1998(4)ALD166; 1998(1)ALT1
the vested bonus would be calculated by the following formula multiply the bonus by actual sum assured and divide by 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Committee Vs. A. Nathi Ram and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-11-1997
Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ1230P& H; (1998)118PLR197
relation to any law relating to establishment it need not multiply the instances only one is sufficient to make the act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial