Multiple - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: multiple Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 91 results (0.016 seconds)Sidrammappa Veerabhadrappa and anr. Vs. Babajappa Balappa and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-14-1960
Reported in: AIR1962Kant38; AIR1962Mys38
equities of the case and with a view to avoid multiply of lingation i thought it just and necessary to go
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVasudevan Namboodiri Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-23-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Ker133
3rd edition volume iii page 1757 it is unnecessary to multiply instances 6 the principle may perhaps be stated differently granting
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagadish Chandra Bhadra Vs. Budge Budge Municipality
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-05-1960
Reported in: (1962)IILLJ549Cal
v raghunath misra and ors air1959sc589 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities because it seems to me firmly established now that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.N. Elias and Co. Private Ltd. Vs. the Authority Appointed Under the ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-07-1960
Reported in: AIR1960Cal603,[1961(3)FLR334],(1961)IILLJ297Cal
the contract of employment although it is not necessary to multiply decisions i might also refer to a patna case which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayan Chandra Nag and ors. Vs. Dinatarini Debi and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-08-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal643
in ilr 39 cal 925 20 21 we need not multiply survey of cases on the point any further excepting that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakshminarayan Ramniwas Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-28-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal616,1961CriLJ635
correct amount of electric energy supplied it was necessary to multiply the meter dial reading by ten but owing to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. Mst. Kaniz Fatema
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-19-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal310,[1960(1)FLR343],(1960)IILLJ334Cal,(1960)IILLJ334Cal
the course of the employment 6 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities as far as i can see it is well
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalipada Sinha Vs. Mahaluxmi Bank Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-31-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal188,[1962]32CompCas503(Cal)
be an acknowledgment under section 19 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities and it is enough to state that this rule
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Security Assurance Co. Vs. R. Ratilal and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-24-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Cal48,[1962]32CompCas246(Cal),64CWN1032
of the indian act it will not be necessary to multiply those basic differences they will be enough to show the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOuchterlony Valley Estates (1938) Ltd. Vs. Government of Madras.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-04-1960
Reported in: [1962]44ITR770(Mad)
good illustration but of course without any ingenuity one could multiply cases by the score supposing a man conducted a milk
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial