Multiple - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Mississippi

Court: US Supreme Court

one was a registered voter there is no need to multiply examples the allegations of this complaint were too serious the

Commissioner of Income-tax, Assam Etc. Vs. the Panbari Tea Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1871; [1965]57ITR422(SC); [1965]3SCR811

view of these three decisions it is not necessary to multiply citations 9 under s 105 of the transfer of property

Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia Vs. Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co. an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC543; [1966]1SCR656

1892 2 ch 27 18 it is hardly necessary to multiply examples it is sufficient to point out that lord denning

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. Ajay Printery Private Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1965]58ITR811(Guj)

labour or machine would be manufacture it is possible to multiply decisions where courts have interpreted the word manufacture in the

Nandan Bhargava Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: (1967)IILLJ327Raj

found in other dictionaries and it is not necessary to multiply reference to dictionaries similarly the term vacancy has been defined

T.G. Balaji Chettiar Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd., Bombay

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad148

observations at pp 725 to 728 it is unnecessary to multiply authorities on this point as in my opinion the law

The Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. K.V. Gopalan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1859; [1965(11)FLR102]; (1965)IILLJ124SC; [1965]3SCR760

..... rule 3 s b sinha dr m k sharma jj resolving suits by entering into multiple compromises agreements necessity of parties to sign all compromises agreements held if the parties enter .....

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Ramagya Sharma Vaidya

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC78; 1966CriLJ79; [1965]3SCR161

..... parties can litigate further in view of the changed law and is done to save multiplicity of proceedings such a ground is not available in the present case ramji missar v .....

C.M.V. Krishnamachari Vs. M.D. Dhanalakshmi Ammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1968Mad142

..... the joinder of parties are based on the principles of avoiding multiplicity of suits not merely to avoid waste of time and ..... a final and complete adjudication of the points involved and avoid multiplicity of proceedings 17 reference must now be made to the decision ..... it is obvious that such a course would result in unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings and would also be exposed to the mischief or .....

C.M.V. Krishnamachari Vs. M.D. Dhanalakshmi Ammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ298

..... the joinder of parties are based on the principles of avoiding multiplicity of suits not merely to avoid waste of time and ..... a final and complete adjudication of the points involved and avoid multiplicity of proceedings 16 reference must now be made to the decision ..... it is obvious that such a course would result in unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings and would also be exposed to the mischief or .....