Does - Judgment Search Results

Doe Vs. Reed

Court: US Supreme Court

..... id at 349 the simple interest in providing voters with additional relevant information does not justify a state requirement that a writer make statements or disclosures she would otherwise ..... evidence suffices to satisfy this apparently more relaxed though perhaps more elusive standard does one instance of actual harassment directed toward one signer mean that the reasonable probability requirement .....

Katori Devi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

..... years hence a total period of service is only five and a half years which does not entitle her to qualify for pension as per government order dated 1 7 1989 .....

Kola Satya Rao Vs. Joint Collector and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2010(3)ALT281

..... passed or decision taken was either irregular or incorrect or illegal or improper this provision does not impose any pre condition that the revisional authority shall not exercise his powers until .....

Utukuri Nagabraham Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... time or in quantity of exceeding fifty quintals of all food grains taken together but does not include a farmer agriculturist ryot who stores foodgrains produced by his for personal cultivation .....

Shailesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Madhyami ...

Court: Allahabad

..... of compassionate appointment which is in the nature of a exception to the general provisions does not unduly interfere with the right of other persons who are eligible for appointment to .....

Sudarshan Kumar S/o Basuki Singh Vs. the Union of India (UOi) through ...

Court: Mumbai

..... under article 226 of the constitution of india the law is well settled that mandamus does not lie to enforce administrative instructions not having any statutory force and which do not .....

Anoop Kumar and Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

..... against his transfer were not considered and that the office memorandum dated 19 5 2009 does not indicate that the petitioner s transfer has been made by the central government on .....

A. Bhaskara Naidu S/O Nataraja Naidu Vs. A. Jyothi Naidu S/O Nataraja ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

..... is of the view that the impugned order of acquittal passed by the trial court does not suffer from infirmity or irregularity warranting interference from this revisional court in any way .....

Naresh Kumar Mishra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

..... be extremely careful to see that under the guise of redressing a public grievance it does not encroach upon the sphere reserved by the constitution to the executive and the legislature .....

Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Che ...

Court: Chennai

..... cannot be appreciated since such a rejection made on the part of the railway board does not seem to be on sound principles of service jurisprudence 16 the tribunal below has .....