Does - Judgment Search Results

Doe Vs. Chao

Court: US Supreme Court

..... nor is it too strong to say that doe does ignore statutory language when doe reads the statute to mean that the united ..... checking account or even get credit cards app 15 doe s several co plaintiffs against whom summary judgment was entered and unanimously ..... normal and reasonable in its extent footnote 5 petitioner doe recognizes that the intentional or willful level of culpability a privacy act .....

Commissioner of Customs (Pre) Vs. Shri Mohammed F. Sheikh and Shri

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... they have failed to produce the documents of legal importation of the seized goods he does not mention under what provision of the customs act requires them to produce such documents .....

Venlon Polyester Film Ltd. and Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(175)ELT782Tri(Bang.)

..... not be said that the appellant had misguided the ac when the ac s order does not refer to their fax message we also find that in their letter dated 5 .....

Adarsh Ice-cream and Frozen Food Vs. C.C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT334Tri(Mum.)bai

..... of duty as the commissioner has observed that the process like hardening of ice cream does not amount to manufacture as such in the absence of any doubt and on the .....

Sargodha Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT519TriDel

..... above could not be raised especially when the very shortage of the raw material hip does not conclusively stand proved as the raw material in process was never taken into account .....

Rungta Irrigation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(96)ECC160

..... not been raised in the memorandum of appeal secondly the learned departmental representative s submission does not take into account the pressure specifications for pipes used in a sprinkler irrigation system .....

Kalyani Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC356

..... would be a factor in determining the cost of the excisable product the question is does the modvat scheme make a difference 16 the central excise rules in chapter vaa deal .....

Himalyan Vegi Fruits Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(179)ELT477TriDel

..... shelf life and since in the present case no preservatives have been added sugar syrup does not have shelf life and hence is not excisable that the commissioner appeals however allowed .....

G.S. Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(97)ECC694

..... in the present case the razor which are to be distributed free alongwith shoe polish does not bear any mrp in the case of jayanti food processing pvt ltd it is .....

Stonemann Marble Inds. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... held that order in the case of siddhartha polymers determining quantum of fine and penalty does not decide the question of law for excess quantity for determining final penalty the ratio .....