Does - Judgment Search Results

Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 2002 syllabus connecticut department of public safety et al v doe individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated certiorari ..... sex offender registry and posting it on the internet respondent doe hereinafter respondent is a convicted sex offender who is ..... the court s rejection of respondents procedural due process claim does not immunize publication schemes like connecticut s from an equal .....

Smith Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... erred in concluding that the act s registration obligations were retributive while the act does differentiate between individuals convicted of aggravated or multiple offenses and those convicted of a ..... accurate information about a criminal record most of which is already public our system does not treat dissemination of truthful information in furtherance of a legitimate governmental objective as .....

Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex. Vs. Pharmacom Remedies (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT934Tri(Mum.)bai

..... others and therefore do not survive the maintenance of separate registers by the present respondents does not create separate persona when manufacturing for himself as also for the loan licensee the .....

Chiripal Twisiting and Sizing Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... bills were bogus as regards the action against the departmental officials he states that he does not have the details but would inform the authorities regarding same 4 after hearing both .....

Psl Holdings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... s bhagat learned j d r for the revenue submits that coating of the pipes does not amount to manufacture and the said process was being undertaken not by the appellants .....

Capstan Meters (India) Limited Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC59

..... scope of the application before him therefore even if his logic is correct his order does not sustain 5 1 countering the arguments shri v valte learned sdr submitted that the .....

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Hind Industrial and Mercantile

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... the appeal memorandum before the tribunal as to why notification no 13 re 92 97 does not cover the imported goods the notification is applicable for the licensing period 1992 97 .....

Manikya Plastichem (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT223Tri(Bang.)

..... excess of the customers requirements they have been returned as left overs and the rule does not permit refund on such goods returned for purposes mentioned under rule 173l 1 he .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Hindustan Composite

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT513Tri(Mum.)bai

..... etc it may be worth while to note that the deputy chief chemist test report does not come out specifically with any findings it only says that it is a sticky .....

Transtamp India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT510Tri(Mum.)bai

..... permitted for import the dispute has arisen only because they are not new the policy does not permit the import of second hand goods except in accordance with the provisions contained .....