Does - Judgment Search Results

Youngdahl Vs. Rainfair

Court: US Supreme Court

..... national labor relations act as amended 61 stat 136 29 u s c 151 respondent does not contend that the state court had power to enjoin peaceful organized activity recognizing that .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi, Ajmer, Rajasthan and Madhya Bharat, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1957P& H288; [1957]32ITR3(P& H)

..... an insurer of all other members the term mutual as applied to an insurance company does not import any peculiar or exact method of producing mutuality in the sense of equality .....

Palace Cinema Vs. Rameshwar Dayal

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1958)IILLJ239P& H

..... has given the tribunal the power to call for and allow inspection of documents it does so subject to the provisions of the civil procedure code which have not even been referred to .....

Karam Chand Vs. Sant Ram Tara Chand and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1958P& H418

..... named arbitrator on account of his close relationship with the applicant respondent this by itself does not show that the parties did not intend to refer their disputes to the arbitration .....

Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath Vs. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1958P& H440

..... insurance company within one year after the date of the loss notwithstanding that the intimation does not specify the amount of the claim or is not in the form if any .....

Krishna Roller Flour Mills Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1958]9STC439(P& H)

..... profit motive was wholly or partially absent whether a transaction is a sale or not does not depend upon the motive of the transferor but upon the nature of the transaction .....

Firm Ganga Ram Kishore Chand Vs. Firm Jai Ram Bhagat Ram

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1957P& H293

..... in contradistinction to a commercial purpose the reasoning of the lower court is fallacious and does not take into consideration either the object underlying section 35 of the punjab relief of .....

Lekh Raj Vs. the Cantonment Board, Jullundur Cantonment and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1958P& H356

..... in an election petition mr mital s argument is that the proviso to rule 43 does not debar such questions being raised before the election tribunal and the bar operates against .....

The Textile Workers Union, Amritsar Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1957P& H255; (1958)IILLJ103P& H

..... is mandatory and that the other sections mentioned above also use similar language this however does not to my mind make any difference to the application of section 21 general clauses .....

Punjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Ram Kanwar and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1957)ILLJ542P& H

..... 5 would have to be prepared after a great deal of labour and section 11 does not in my view contemplate the preparation of evidence by one party for the benefit .....