Skip to content


Does - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 2,538 results (0.189 seconds)
Jan 31 1979 (TRI)

Nar Hari Dalmia Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-31-1979

Reported in: (1984)7ITD463(Delhi)

..... to challenge the decision of the tribunal for the earlier assessment year as that decision does not operate as res judicata or work as an estoppel in respect of the assessment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 1979 (SC)

Jorubha Juzer Singh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-19-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC358; 1980CriLJ314; (1980)1SCC672; 1980(12)LC137(SC)

..... of the deceased had accompanied him the fact that the relatives may have come afterwards does not appear to be of any significance moreover we find no reason why the deceased .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1979 (SC)

Mahadeo and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-26-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC102; 1980CriLJ189; (1980)1SCC490; 1979(11)LC660(SC)

..... report was in the nature of an admission and if taken as a whole it does not incriminate the appellants at all 3 thus the position is that there is no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 29 1979 (SC)

Marudanal Augusti Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-29-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC638; 1980CriLJ446; (1980)4SCC425

..... by the sub magistrate the investigating officer in spite of being questioned on this matter does not appear to have any explanation whatsoever for this delay on the other hand he .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 1979 (SC)

Lakhanpal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-23-1979

Reported in: 1979CriLJ1217; (1979)3SCC256; 1980Supp(1)SCC716; 1979(11)LC889(SC)

..... therefore the mere fact that the appellant and the deceased were together in the field does not land to the irresistible inference that the appellant must have murdered the deceased as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 1979 (SC)

Manne Subbarao and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-12-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC2113; 1980CriLJ1476; (1980)3SCC140; 1979(11)LC674(SC)

..... out three manifest defects in the prosecution case which according to him the high court does not appear to have noticed while reversing the order of acquittal passed by the sessions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 1979 (SC)

Kishan Chand Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-20-1979

Reported in: AIR1979SC1128; 1979CriLJ921; (1979)4SCC709; [1979]3SCR313

..... shall not be used in milk and cream the prohibition contained in the proviso thus does not apply to ice cream kulfi chocolate ice cream covered by sub item a 11 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1979 (SC)

K. Lakshmana Rao Vs. Public Prosecutor, State of Andhra Pradesh and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-30-1979

Reported in: AIR1979SC1324; 1979CriLJ1067; (1979)4SCC638; 1979(11)LC882(SC)

..... she might have felt shy to make allegation against accused involving her honour this reason does not appeal to us indeed if the complainant was so much concerned with her honour .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1979 (SC)

Joginder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-17-1979

Reported in: AIR1979SC1876; 1979CriLJ1406; (1980)1SCC493; 1979(11)LC849(SC)

..... was denied to our minds also the story appears to be entirely ridiculous but it does give an indication of the way the minds of she accused were working apparently they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1979 (SC)

Mohammed Mytheen Shahul Hameed Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-01-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC108; 1980CriLJ192; (1979)4SCC708; 1980(Supp)SCC18; 1979(11)LC600(SC)

..... and vindictively and not in self defence 18 exception ii to section 300 penal code does not apply because no right of private defence ever accrued to the appellant 19 as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //