Does - Year 1999 - Judgments

Jan 01 1999 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mira Silk Mills

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-01-1999

Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT934Tri(Mum.)bai

..... register has saying that the fabrics were measured before entry in the register the notice does not say that this is wrong further the entries in the vandana note book themselves .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 1999 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Jay Hind Industries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-13-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC452

..... activity did not amount to manufacture and allowed the appeal we find that the revenue does not derive much from this judgment 8 the j g glass judgment however is more .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 1999 (TRI)

Sedco Forex International Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-17-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC497

..... clearly shows that the correspondence between the ongc and the department produced in this case does not give any impression that there was an understanding between ongc and the department that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 1999 (TRI)

Bhilwara Spinners Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-17-1999

Reported in: (1999)(65)ECC503

..... observe that it is not the question of classification before us the central excise tariff does not use any expression like double fold or multi fold or cabled yarn in terms .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1999 (TRI)

Dr. Beck and Co. (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC461

..... the duty cast on the asstt collector for checking the declaration filed the declaration filed does not indicate as to the nature and variety of the cement which the appellants would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1999 (TRI)

Bayer Diagnostics India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC191

..... the departmental representative s contention that the goods were not entered in the rgi register does not address the issue on the liability to duty

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1999 (TRI)

Titan Watches Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-1999

Reported in: (1999)LC976Tri(Delhi)

..... assembly chart of various components of watches of citizen watch co ltd in my view does not advance the case of the appellants all these submissions at best prove that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1999 (TRI)

Visen Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC466

..... classification dated 21 3 1991 the test report quoted by him in the order also does not lead to the presumption that this classification under chapter heading 3402 was wrong the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 13 1999 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vxl (India) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-13-1999

Reported in: (1999)LC980Tri(Delhi)

..... which is not carded or combed and which has already been scoured while the revenue does not dispute that the customs tariff mentions about raw wool and greasy wool or fleece .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 18 1999 (TRI)

Gaba Electronics Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-18-1999

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT528TriDel

..... and in the instant case since the penalty has been imposed the question of waiver does not arise he also contended that show cause notice is mandatory for confirmation of duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Does - Judgment Search Results