Does - Judgment Search Results

Waterman S.S. Corp. Vs. Dugan and Mcnamara, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... co 355 u s 563 the warranty may be breached when the stevedore s negligence does no more than call into play the vessel s unseaworthiness crumady v the j h .....

S. Chatterjee Vs. Dr. K.L. Bhave and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP323; [1962]32CompCas830(MP)

..... the subject takes upon himself to represent a certain state of facts to exist he does so at his peril and if it be done either with a view to secure .....

Barham Dutt and Ors. Vs. Peoples' Co-operative Transport Society Ltd., ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H24

..... of a single judge to a division bench of two judges of the same court does not in my view make any real difference and indeed mr narula has not been .....

Harcharan Singh Vs. Isher Singh and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H55

..... the punjab chief court in jawala sahai v ram singh 67 pun be 1909 which does to a great extent support mr thapar s contention but that decision was expressly dissented .....

Smt. Chander Wati Vs. L. Hari Chand and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H11

..... at rs 100 p m for the three months prior to the suit 2 it does not appear to have been contended that the first two reliefs have not been properly .....

Agricultural Income-tax Commissioner Vs. Jethmal Girdharilal.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1962]44ITR664(MP)

..... act do not at all contemplate a broken period of a few months the act does not provide any special machinery of levy of tax for any broken period if it .....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Somnath

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1961]12STC72(MP)

..... 2 of the sales tax act has therefore no application and the limitation provided therein does not bar the prosecution 14 in the view that i have taken the dismissal of .....

Chiman Singh Sultansingh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP394; 1960CriLJ1619

..... should be afforded to the accused to adduce evidence 10 the learned additional government advocate does not oppose the prayer that the case be sent back to the trial court for .....

Chhegalal Ramniwas Vs. Shyamlal Parmatma Swarup Merchants of Delhi

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP387

..... appears for the respondent on the other hand contends that section 40 c p c does not justify the view that in case no rules are framed in the state of .....

Ghanshyam Dass Rastogi Vs. A.N. Syal and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1961P& H131

..... but it is a relevant circumstance for consideration that a vindication of honour and reputation does not necessarily require a suit for recovery of heavy damages as has been done in .....