Does - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 10,726 results (0.301 seconds)Nanda Devi Sharma and ors. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-2008
Reported in: (2008)(128)ECC48
..... was higher than the purchase price including the tax elements by about 10 but this does not mean that the excise duty has been passed on to the buyers for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTirb Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Ito
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-09-2008
Reported in: (2008)304ITR76(Mum.)
..... is reproduced by us we are aware of the fact that strictly speaking res judicata does not apply to income tax proceedings again each assessment year being a unit what is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPransukhlal and Sons Jewellers Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-11-2008
Reported in: (2008)116TTJ(Mum.)197
..... of such other persons that means if the material found in the course of search does not indicate any undisclosed income belonging to any other persons than the persons searched then .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJai UshIn Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2008
Reported in: (2008)117TTJ(Delhi)330
..... existed prior to 1 4 1997 is apparently beneficial to the assessees and the same does not seem to have caused any hardship to the assessees in general and therefore the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGhanshyam Jangid Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Jan-04-2008
Reported in: (2008)114TTJ(Jodh.)834
..... that the investment of rs 71 000 was made out of unrecorded income the assessee does not maintain any books of accounts his reference books in statement are found to refer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Avdesh Kumar Parvinder S. Kochar
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-22-2008
Reported in: (2008)117TTJ(Delhi)137
..... imposition of penalty of rs 21 lakhs there cannot be no two opinions that it does not the ao has evidently been harsh with the assessee by imposing a penalty of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPaliwal Overseas Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-2008
Reported in: (2008)117TTJ(Delhi)427
..... para 32 11 thereof which indicates that netting is contemplated in expln baa also it does not notice the effect of the words included in such profits following the words receipts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPreeti Tex Vs. the Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-18-2008
Reported in: (2008)304ITR266(Chennai)
..... that a cif contract since discovered as a contract for sale of goods this however does not mean that a cif contract is altogether divorced from delivery of goods it contemplates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.G. Hotel Pvt. Ltd., 1967 Vs. Acit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra
Decided on: Jan-15-2008
Reported in: (2008)113ITD99Agra
..... as found in the explanation aforesaid wen not there at that time this case therefore does not help the assessee 14 the contention of the assessee that the re opening was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMeghraj Baid Vs. Income Tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur
Decided on: Feb-14-2008
Reported in: (2008)114TTJ(Jodh.)841
..... in its letters and spirit we are of the opinion that in case the ao does not agree with the explanation of the assessee with regard to lower consideration disclosed by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial